<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The asbestos litigation machine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/05/the-asbestos-litigation-machine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com/2008/05/the-asbestos-litigation-machine/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-asbestos-litigation-machine</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 13:04:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: E-Bell</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2008/05/the-asbestos-litigation-machine/comment-page-1/#comment-11805</link>
		<dc:creator>E-Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 08:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=6193#comment-11805</guid>
		<description>This is a good report.  Everyone who thinks there&#039;s nothing wrong with mass tort litigation should read it.

I&#039;ve had a brief exposure to asbestos litigation on the defense side.  What I saw was pretty amazing.

These mass tort lawyers go to the union halls and sign people up who &lt;i&gt;might&lt;/i&gt; have been exposed to asbestos at some point in their past.  They get screened by a hand-picked doctor, who invariably finds that the 85-year-old man who smoked 2 packs a day for 60 years and has recently started to develop shortness of breath has an indeterminate smudge on his chest x-ray.

The diagnosis, of course, is asbestosis.

Almost invariably, these plaintiffs can&#039;t provide any evidence that they were exposed to asbestos-containing products at all, let alone which products they were or which companies made them.

It&#039;s a shakedown, pure and simple.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a good report.  Everyone who thinks there&#8217;s nothing wrong with mass tort litigation should read it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve had a brief exposure to asbestos litigation on the defense side.  What I saw was pretty amazing.</p>
<p>These mass tort lawyers go to the union halls and sign people up who <i>might</i> have been exposed to asbestos at some point in their past.  They get screened by a hand-picked doctor, who invariably finds that the 85-year-old man who smoked 2 packs a day for 60 years and has recently started to develop shortness of breath has an indeterminate smudge on his chest x-ray.</p>
<p>The diagnosis, of course, is asbestosis.</p>
<p>Almost invariably, these plaintiffs can&#8217;t provide any evidence that they were exposed to asbestos-containing products at all, let alone which products they were or which companies made them.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a shakedown, pure and simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous Attorney</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2008/05/the-asbestos-litigation-machine/comment-page-1/#comment-11804</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous Attorney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 16:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=6193#comment-11804</guid>
		<description>Looks like a solid report. We need John Stossel of ABC to feature it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like a solid report. We need John Stossel of ABC to feature it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.434 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-05-27 11:20:11 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
