<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The case against &#8220;Civil Gideon&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/06/the-case-against-civil-gideon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com/2008/06/the-case-against-civil-gideon/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-case-against-civil-gideon</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 16:10:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Celia</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2008/06/the-case-against-civil-gideon/comment-page-1/#comment-22019</link>
		<dc:creator>Celia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 18:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7159#comment-22019</guid>
		<description>“The talk was mistakenly interpreted as an attack on criminal Gideon itself.”

Unless you “extemporized” an awful lot, I cannot imagine how THIS talk could have been so mistakenly interpreted. 

I’m sorry the moderator didn’t ask you a slightly different version of the termination of parental rights question, viz what might be your position on government-provided counsel in cases where the court seeks to terminate parental rights?

I enjoyed your prepared remarks - sorry I missed the talk. Keep up the good
 work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“The talk was mistakenly interpreted as an attack on criminal Gideon itself.”</p>
<p>Unless you “extemporized” an awful lot, I cannot imagine how THIS talk could have been so mistakenly interpreted. </p>
<p>I’m sorry the moderator didn’t ask you a slightly different version of the termination of parental rights question, viz what might be your position on government-provided counsel in cases where the court seeks to terminate parental rights?</p>
<p>I enjoyed your prepared remarks &#8211; sorry I missed the talk. Keep up the good<br />
 work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deoxy</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2008/06/the-case-against-civil-gideon/comment-page-1/#comment-21999</link>
		<dc:creator>Deoxy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7159#comment-21999</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;the solution is to stop Child Protective Services&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The solution to many things is to stop CPS - they are at least as bad as the problems they are supposed to fix.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>the solution is to stop Child Protective Services</p></blockquote>
<p>The solution to many things is to stop CPS &#8211; they are at least as bad as the problems they are supposed to fix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.106 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-05-27 13:15:54 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
