<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Botch a client&#8217;s case? Put nothing in writing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/07/botch-a-clients-case-put-nothing-in-writing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com/2008/07/botch-a-clients-case-put-nothing-in-writing/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=botch-a-clients-case-put-nothing-in-writing</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 16:10:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: ParatrooperJJ</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2008/07/botch-a-clients-case-put-nothing-in-writing/comment-page-1/#comment-25298</link>
		<dc:creator>ParatrooperJJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 19:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7296#comment-25298</guid>
		<description>Standard practice in any business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Standard practice in any business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OBQuiet</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2008/07/botch-a-clients-case-put-nothing-in-writing/comment-page-1/#comment-25266</link>
		<dc:creator>OBQuiet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 11:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7296#comment-25266</guid>
		<description>Interesting link. They say that the communication would not be privileged since both parties have a fiduciary duty to the client so it is better NOT to put it in writing. 

Can anyone come up with a reason for this that is not based on avoiding being caught violating the ethical obligation to the client? Written or Oral, the communication took place. I didn&#039;t go back and read the original article from New York Lawyer. Perhaps it was titled &quot;5 Easy Ways to Cheat Your Client Without Getting Caught&quot; 

I wonder if they suggest billing for both your time and your higher-ups while consulting on how to avoid taking the fall?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting link. They say that the communication would not be privileged since both parties have a fiduciary duty to the client so it is better NOT to put it in writing. </p>
<p>Can anyone come up with a reason for this that is not based on avoiding being caught violating the ethical obligation to the client? Written or Oral, the communication took place. I didn&#8217;t go back and read the original article from New York Lawyer. Perhaps it was titled &#8220;5 Easy Ways to Cheat Your Client Without Getting Caught&#8221; </p>
<p>I wonder if they suggest billing for both your time and your higher-ups while consulting on how to avoid taking the fall?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.361 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-05-27 13:21:07 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
