Chronicling the high cost of our legal system

Overlawyered

August 29th, 2008 at 8:48 am

“Hit-and-run driver claims city didn’t take care of his Bentley after crash”

“A Coney Island businessman is suing the city for damaging the Bentley he was driving when he killed a Brooklyn dad in a hit-and-run accident. Harry Shasho, who pleaded guilty to leaving the scene of an accident, says the NYPD failed to safeguard the battered black 2005 Bentley GT luxury sedan that was impounded as evidence of the fatal crash. He’s asking for at least $190,000.” However, Shasho “denied filing a lawsuit” when contacted by a Daily News reporter. (John Marzulli, New York Daily News, Aug. 24).

I’m going to take a wild guess here and speculate that Shasho’s auto insurer will turn out to have been a force in the decision to sue. Under most property insurance policies, after paying a loss the insurer reserves the right to go after third parties it thinks it can be blamed, and the policyholder must up to a reasonable point cooperate in such lawsuits (which may be filed in the policyholder’s name). The insurer needn’t and probably won’t take into its calculations the effect of such a suit on its policyholder’s reputation, which in this case for Shasho include being called “shameless” and worse in the comments section at Gothamist. Such insurer-prompted suits on behalf of wrongdoers are fairly common, and should be kept analytically distinct from the (also fairly common) situations where the wrongdoer himself decides to sue and is the one to pocket any proceeds.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Related posts


In ; ;
3
  • 1

    To be fair, having your vehicle damaged is not supposed to be part of the punishment for hit-and-run, and at the point at which the police were negligent (assuming that they were), the owner of the vehicle had not been convicted. Even if Shasho filed the suit himself, I don’t see it as improper.

    Bill Poser on August 29th, 2008
  • 2

    Bill,

    According to the article, Shasho said that the when he turned himself in, the vehicle was in “pristine condition.” The police disagree, saying the windshield was cracked, the bumper was damaged and the hood was dented. Those would seem to be typical of damages to a car that was involved in a hit and run accident where the victim died.

    Several articles say that the original police report when the car was impounded has the damages to it listed.

    gitarcarver on August 29th, 2008
  • 3

    [...] posts about the defendant (or his insurer) suing the city for not properly taking car of his car in the impound in a fatal hit and run [...]

    Blawg Review #175 | Dui Lawyers on September 2nd, 2008

 

RSS feed for comments on this post | TrackBack URI