<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wrestlers Slam WWE and Claim: We&#8217;re Not Independent Contractors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/08/wrestlers-slam-wwe-and-claim-were-not-independent-contractors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com/2008/08/wrestlers-slam-wwe-and-claim-were-not-independent-contractors/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:26:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: March 9 roundup</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2008/08/wrestlers-slam-wwe-and-claim-were-not-independent-contractors/comment-page-1/#comment-42113</link>
		<dc:creator>March 9 roundup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 04:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7454#comment-42113</guid>
		<description>[...] Three pro wrestlers thrown out of court in employment suit against World Wrestling Entertainment [Daniel Schwartz, earlier] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Three pro wrestlers thrown out of court in employment suit against World Wrestling Entertainment [Daniel Schwartz, earlier] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Update: wrestlers&#8217; class action against WWE</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2008/08/wrestlers-slam-wwe-and-claim-were-not-independent-contractors/comment-page-1/#comment-30445</link>
		<dc:creator>Update: wrestlers&#8217; class action against WWE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 05:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7454#comment-30445</guid>
		<description>[...] Daniel Schwartz of the Connecticut Employment Law Blog contributed a highly popular post about the class-action lawsuit filed by three professional wrestlers (&#8221;Raven&#8221;, &#8220;Chris Kanyon&#8221;, and &#8220;&#8216;Above Average&#8217; Mike [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Daniel Schwartz of the Connecticut Employment Law Blog contributed a highly popular post about the class-action lawsuit filed by three professional wrestlers (&#8221;Raven&#8221;, &#8220;Chris Kanyon&#8221;, and &#8220;&#8216;Above Average&#8217; Mike [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD Storm</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2008/08/wrestlers-slam-wwe-and-claim-were-not-independent-contractors/comment-page-1/#comment-30443</link>
		<dc:creator>JD Storm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 04:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7454#comment-30443</guid>
		<description>If memory serves me correctly, it was WCW who saddled Mike Sanders with the moniker &quot;Above Average&quot;. although, WWE did eventually buy out WCW, so that point is probably moot anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If memory serves me correctly, it was WCW who saddled Mike Sanders with the moniker &#8220;Above Average&#8221;. although, WWE did eventually buy out WCW, so that point is probably moot anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BP</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2008/08/wrestlers-slam-wwe-and-claim-were-not-independent-contractors/comment-page-1/#comment-27920</link>
		<dc:creator>BP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 02:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7454#comment-27920</guid>
		<description>No comment on the class as a whole, but if &quot;Above Average&quot; Mike Sanders can offer any evidence the WWE saddled him with that awful moniker, I&#039;d have to conclude they exercised a level of control over him that is more indicative of an employee than a contractor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No comment on the class as a whole, but if &#8220;Above Average&#8221; Mike Sanders can offer any evidence the WWE saddled him with that awful moniker, I&#8217;d have to conclude they exercised a level of control over him that is more indicative of an employee than a contractor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

