<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Daily Roundup 2008-12-31</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/12/daily-roundup-2008-12-31/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com/2008/12/daily-roundup-2008-12-31/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=daily-roundup-2008-12-31</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 16:39:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2008/12/daily-roundup-2008-12-31/comment-page-1/#comment-37887</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 18:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=8077#comment-37887</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not convinced the Spears thing is completely frivolous. I don&#039;t know that it&#039;s worth money, but I think that it&#039;s plainly obvious that anything they thought they were saving Spears from would have been inflicted on the other gal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not convinced the Spears thing is completely frivolous. I don&#8217;t know that it&#8217;s worth money, but I think that it&#8217;s plainly obvious that anything they thought they were saving Spears from would have been inflicted on the other gal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Neal</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2008/12/daily-roundup-2008-12-31/comment-page-1/#comment-37884</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Neal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 18:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=8077#comment-37884</guid>
		<description>SSFC, you did a fine, fine job (from a fellow NC defense lawyer)!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SSFC, you did a fine, fine job (from a fellow NC defense lawyer)!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PatW</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2008/12/daily-roundup-2008-12-31/comment-page-1/#comment-37878</link>
		<dc:creator>PatW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 16:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=8077#comment-37878</guid>
		<description>Yes, that deserves a misconduct complaint filed at the PD, but not a demand for money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, that deserves a misconduct complaint filed at the PD, but not a demand for money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2008/12/daily-roundup-2008-12-31/comment-page-1/#comment-37877</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 15:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=8077#comment-37877</guid>
		<description>Pat, I agree it&#039;s frivolous to the extent she probably didn&#039;t suffer damages.  But if a cop used me as bait to assist the easy departure of some insipid celeb, I&#039;d be on the warpath for that cop&#039;s job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pat, I agree it&#8217;s frivolous to the extent she probably didn&#8217;t suffer damages.  But if a cop used me as bait to assist the easy departure of some insipid celeb, I&#8217;d be on the warpath for that cop&#8217;s job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PatW</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2008/12/daily-roundup-2008-12-31/comment-page-1/#comment-37876</link>
		<dc:creator>PatW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 15:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=8077#comment-37876</guid>
		<description>That Spears thing may be the most frivolous money grab I have ever heard of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That Spears thing may be the most frivolous money grab I have ever heard of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2008/12/daily-roundup-2008-12-31/comment-page-1/#comment-37871</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 15:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=8077#comment-37871</guid>
		<description>With respect to the New Jersey case, it seems as if the ministry&#039;s arguments would have applied with equal force if they had decided to open an Arby&#039;s franchise and then refuse to sell food to Catholics or something.  Perhaps an argument can be made that the entirety of anti-discrimination law violates First Amendment freedoms.  But I don&#039;t think this is a credible tipping point.  

  &lt;a href=&quot;http://religionclause.blogspot.com/2008/12/nj-finds-discrimination-in-faith-groups.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Religion Clause&lt;/a&gt; has links to &lt;i&gt;both&lt;/i&gt; NJCRD decisions issued yesterday.  In the second one, NJCRD found no probable cause to proceed on a complaint by another same-sex couple against the ministry on the grounds that the ministry, at that point, had decided to cease offering the pavilion as a public accommodation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With respect to the New Jersey case, it seems as if the ministry&#8217;s arguments would have applied with equal force if they had decided to open an Arby&#8217;s franchise and then refuse to sell food to Catholics or something.  Perhaps an argument can be made that the entirety of anti-discrimination law violates First Amendment freedoms.  But I don&#8217;t think this is a credible tipping point.  </p>
<p>  <a href="http://religionclause.blogspot.com/2008/12/nj-finds-discrimination-in-faith-groups.html" rel="nofollow">Religion Clause</a> has links to <i>both</i> NJCRD decisions issued yesterday.  In the second one, NJCRD found no probable cause to proceed on a complaint by another same-sex couple against the ministry on the grounds that the ministry, at that point, had decided to cease offering the pavilion as a public accommodation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.139 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-05-27 14:35:07 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
