<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microblog 2008-12-26</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/12/microblog-2008-12-26/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com/2008/12/microblog-2008-12-26/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=microblog-2008-12-26</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 16:39:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Melvin H.</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2008/12/microblog-2008-12-26/comment-page-1/#comment-37650</link>
		<dc:creator>Melvin H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 18:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=8067#comment-37650</guid>
		<description>A &quot;people&#039;s indictment&quot;, huh?  

Two thoughts:

(1)  Seems to me the Boy Scouts in Philadelphia have a far more legitimate reason than the so-called &quot;library coalition&quot; to supposedly &quot;people&#039;s-indict&quot; anyone--besides, doesn&#039;t &quot;people&#039;s indictment&quot; sound like something from the PEOPLE&#039;S Republic of China anyway?

(2)  If the mayor had thought of this, he could have issued a &quot;civil mayor&#039;s indictment&quot; against the so-called &quot;library coalition&quot;; said indictment could&#039;ve had in it the &quot;possibility&quot; of forcing the group&#039;s members to pony up their OWN money to keep the libraries open or for the coalition to BUY the libraries outright.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A &#8220;people&#8217;s indictment&#8221;, huh?  </p>
<p>Two thoughts:</p>
<p>(1)  Seems to me the Boy Scouts in Philadelphia have a far more legitimate reason than the so-called &#8220;library coalition&#8221; to supposedly &#8220;people&#8217;s-indict&#8221; anyone&#8211;besides, doesn&#8217;t &#8220;people&#8217;s indictment&#8221; sound like something from the PEOPLE&#8217;S Republic of China anyway?</p>
<p>(2)  If the mayor had thought of this, he could have issued a &#8220;civil mayor&#8217;s indictment&#8221; against the so-called &#8220;library coalition&#8221;; said indictment could&#8217;ve had in it the &#8220;possibility&#8221; of forcing the group&#8217;s members to pony up their OWN money to keep the libraries open or for the coalition to BUY the libraries outright.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Bratten</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2008/12/microblog-2008-12-26/comment-page-1/#comment-37649</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Bratten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 17:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=8067#comment-37649</guid>
		<description>&quot;Your tax dollars at work: General Motors files suit to recover “hostage” auto parts &quot;

Ironic, yes; Overlawyered, not. Folks are getting court orders most  everyday to get back property they own from bankrupt businesses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Your tax dollars at work: General Motors files suit to recover “hostage” auto parts &#8221;</p>
<p>Ironic, yes; Overlawyered, not. Folks are getting court orders most  everyday to get back property they own from bankrupt businesses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.111 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-05-27 14:41:44 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
