Mike Cernovich thinks the plaintiff suing over the sugar-laden beverage might have spared himself a lot of trouble by, you know, reading the label.
Chronicling the high cost of our legal system
by Walter Olson on January 20, 2009
Mike Cernovich thinks the plaintiff suing over the sugar-laden beverage might have spared himself a lot of trouble by, you know, reading the label.
Tagged as: CSPI, labels, soft drinks

Individual liberty, free markets, and peace: the world's premier libertarian think tank. Publishes Cato at Liberty, where I blog on contemporary policy issues.
Get your copy today! My new book tackles the question of why so many bad ideas come from the law schools. "Cutting-edge commentary, hard-hitting, witty, astute." -- Publisher's Weekly. "Excellent... A fine dissection of these strangely powerful institutions" -- Wall Street Journal.
{ 3 comments }
Somewhere, there’s a lawyer waiting in the tall grass. He’s looking for a brand with a limp; one that’s done just too good of a job convincing the world that it’s not a brand but a way of life…and with my best Discovery Channel English accent, “there he goes, in full burst, after his prey.”
Strangely, I placed a comment on that blog, on the post regarding legal ethics, pointing out that he had his facts wrong, and it was deleted. I wonder if he gets many dissenters there.
though personally, my intake of vitamin water = fewer calories than the soda I HAD been drinking. (It’s not a total improvement but significant.)
I also find I don’t drink near as much of it as I was the soda, so for ME, the calorie reduction is better than the 1 container vs 1 container.
Also the vitamin water is not carbonated (better for my teeth than even diet soda provide proper hygiene is maintained), and not caffeinated.
So YEAH read the label and use your brain.
Comments on this entry are closed.