<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Didn&#8217;t want &#8220;sibling relationship to completely disintegrate over this tragedy”</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/01/didnt-want-sibling-relationship-to-completely-disintegrate-over-this-tragedy%e2%80%9d/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com/2009/01/didnt-want-sibling-relationship-to-completely-disintegrate-over-this-tragedy%e2%80%9d/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:26:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Hochfelder</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2009/01/didnt-want-sibling-relationship-to-completely-disintegrate-over-this-tragedy%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-39560</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hochfelder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 16:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=8612#comment-39560</guid>
		<description>New York juries hate suits against relatives, especially those claiming that negligence caused a trip and fall at a relative&#039;s home home, and the juries routinely find for the defendant in those cases. In this case, though, the jury clearly saw what was happening - that plaintiff had to sue the her relative/host driver in order to join as a defendant the manufacturer, Ford Motor, on the seat belt claim. And in the end, of course, the jury found no liability on Ford&#039;s part, instead probably properly assessing 100% fault against the driver.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New York juries hate suits against relatives, especially those claiming that negligence caused a trip and fall at a relative&#8217;s home home, and the juries routinely find for the defendant in those cases. In this case, though, the jury clearly saw what was happening &#8211; that plaintiff had to sue the her relative/host driver in order to join as a defendant the manufacturer, Ford Motor, on the seat belt claim. And in the end, of course, the jury found no liability on Ford&#8217;s part, instead probably properly assessing 100% fault against the driver.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

