<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The law does not concern itself with trifling pinball-machine depictions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/01/the-law-does-not-concern-itself-with-trifling-pinball-machine-depictions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com/2009/01/the-law-does-not-concern-itself-with-trifling-pinball-machine-depictions/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-law-does-not-concern-itself-with-trifling-pinball-machine-depictions</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 16:39:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2009/01/the-law-does-not-concern-itself-with-trifling-pinball-machine-depictions/comment-page-1/#comment-38023</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 22:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=8080#comment-38023</guid>
		<description>As much as I oppose frivolous litigation, I, too, might sue if I were involuntarily featured in &quot;What Women Want,&quot; or for that matter in any other Mel Gibson movie that does not involve shooting and/or gouging.  I would settle out if, in the DVD editions, they bluescreened in, Greedo-shot-first style, a little sign for me to carry saying &quot;I am not associated with this piece of crap.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As much as I oppose frivolous litigation, I, too, might sue if I were involuntarily featured in &#8220;What Women Want,&#8221; or for that matter in any other Mel Gibson movie that does not involve shooting and/or gouging.  I would settle out if, in the DVD editions, they bluescreened in, Greedo-shot-first style, a little sign for me to carry saying &#8220;I am not associated with this piece of crap.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Nieporent</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2009/01/the-law-does-not-concern-itself-with-trifling-pinball-machine-depictions/comment-page-1/#comment-37930</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Nieporent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 14:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=8080#comment-37930</guid>
		<description>Don’t companies normally pay for product placement in a movie? You would think that Gottlieb Development would have been happy to get it for free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don’t companies normally pay for product placement in a movie? You would think that Gottlieb Development would have been happy to get it for free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.368 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-05-27 14:21:26 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
