<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lawyers paid in gift cards, cont&#8217;d</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/02/lawyers-paid-in-gift-cards-contd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com/2009/02/lawyers-paid-in-gift-cards-contd/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 06:39:32 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ron Miller</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2009/02/lawyers-paid-in-gift-cards-contd/comment-page-1/#comment-40134</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=8946#comment-40134</guid>
		<description>Doug, I think you might be missing my point.  I agreed that the scenario you set forth is far from a perfect outcome. But what I&#039;m telling you is that there is deterrance effect - companies play things straight(er) to avoid getting sued.  This is a good thing because it helps keep products safe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug, I think you might be missing my point.  I agreed that the scenario you set forth is far from a perfect outcome. But what I&#8217;m telling you is that there is deterrance effect &#8211; companies play things straight(er) to avoid getting sued.  This is a good thing because it helps keep products safe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2009/02/lawyers-paid-in-gift-cards-contd/comment-page-1/#comment-40026</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 20:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=8946#comment-40026</guid>
		<description>I disagree.  The public is not protected when the plaintiff law firm often makes 10&#039;s of million of dollars and the few named plaintiffs are awarded a few 1000 of dollars.  The rest of the class receive coupons, substandard makeup or some other useless stuff.  Its all about the money, not protecting the public.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree.  The public is not protected when the plaintiff law firm often makes 10&#8217;s of million of dollars and the few named plaintiffs are awarded a few 1000 of dollars.  The rest of the class receive coupons, substandard makeup or some other useless stuff.  Its all about the money, not protecting the public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Miller</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2009/02/lawyers-paid-in-gift-cards-contd/comment-page-1/#comment-40021</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=8946#comment-40021</guid>
		<description>A lot of these lawsuits do protect consumers with plaintiffs&#039; consumer lawyers playing the role of watchdog.  Still, I too find disconcerting the fees earned by attorneys in these types of case when the recovery is a gift card or two free tune-ups.  What I&#039;m less clear on is what would be a better system that still maintains the private watchdog impact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of these lawsuits do protect consumers with plaintiffs&#8217; consumer lawyers playing the role of watchdog.  Still, I too find disconcerting the fees earned by attorneys in these types of case when the recovery is a gift card or two free tune-ups.  What I&#8217;m less clear on is what would be a better system that still maintains the private watchdog impact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

