Comments on: NRDC’s non-compliant onesie http://overlawyered.com/2009/02/nrdcs-non-compliant-onesie/ Chronicling the high cost of our legal system Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:26:11 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: CPSIA chronicles, February 19 http://overlawyered.com/2009/02/nrdcs-non-compliant-onesie/comment-page-1/#comment-40677 CPSIA chronicles, February 19 Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:21:38 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/?p=8858#comment-40677 [...] already visited the question whether one big organization that has vociferously defended CPSIA, the Natural [...] [...] already visited the question whether one big organization that has vociferously defended CPSIA, the Natural [...]

]]> By: Connie http://overlawyered.com/2009/02/nrdcs-non-compliant-onesie/comment-page-1/#comment-39858 Connie Sun, 08 Feb 2009 06:43:38 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/?p=8858#comment-39858 We know, K, we know. I will watch their website to see how many days before that ***sie is taken off their website. We know, K, we know. I will watch their website to see how many days before that ***sie is taken off their website.

]]> By: K http://overlawyered.com/2009/02/nrdcs-non-compliant-onesie/comment-page-1/#comment-39835 K Sat, 07 Feb 2009 21:31:51 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/?p=8858#comment-39835 I'm going to have to remember to post my findings before I twitter or DM them because I get no glory lol. I just get so carried away with excitement. Note: Gerber has been informed of NRDC's transgression officially. ~whistling~ I’m going to have to remember to post my findings before I twitter or DM them because I get no glory lol. I just get so carried away with excitement.

Note: Gerber has been informed of NRDC’s transgression officially. ~whistling~

]]> By: Melvin H. http://overlawyered.com/2009/02/nrdcs-non-compliant-onesie/comment-page-1/#comment-39827 Melvin H. Sat, 07 Feb 2009 16:45:11 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/?p=8858#comment-39827 What am I missing here--the CPSIA itself, it seems to me, is the civil equivalent of a person who, driving 70 mph in a 75 zone one day, gets ticketed for speeding because the speed limit in that zone is now 55 mph . . . and gets fined $5000 per mile over the limit for every day it happened. In other words, couldn't someone haul this screwed-up law up before a judge as <i> ex post facto </i> under the U.S. Constitution, in order to repeal or stop this from taking effect? What am I missing here–the CPSIA itself, it seems to me, is the civil equivalent of a person who, driving 70 mph in a 75 zone one day, gets ticketed for speeding because the speed limit in that zone is now 55 mph . . . and gets fined $5000 per mile over the limit for every day it happened.
In other words, couldn’t someone haul this screwed-up law up before a judge as ex post facto under the U.S. Constitution, in order to repeal or stop this from taking effect?

]]> By: Darby http://overlawyered.com/2009/02/nrdcs-non-compliant-onesie/comment-page-1/#comment-39789 Darby Fri, 06 Feb 2009 20:40:02 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/?p=8858#comment-39789 You think the NY Times will do a story on that? Right. You think the NY Times will do a story on that? Right.

]]>