Asks to have $12.6 million verdict set aside because juror Twittered about the case [Little Rock, Ark.; AP/Yahoo]
Florida legislator opposes “animal husbandry,” thinks it’s sin forbidden in Book of Leviticus. And “Larcenia” is probably the most perfect first name for a politician I’ve ever heard [Popehat]
Eleventh Circuit upholds most charges against Alabama ex-Gov. Don Siegelman [AP/New York Times, earlier]
D.C. Council member bullies tiny non-profit paper, says advertiser “will be held responsible” [Marc Fisher, WaPo; Brookland Heartbeat]
“Worst teachers are rarely formally removed from the classroom” [Denver Post]
Blogger calling fashion model a skank makes an unsympathetic figure, but the implications for blog anonymity could be serious [NY Post, Scott Greenfield, (Cit Media Law, earlier]
Barbie says, “Governing West Virginia is hard!” [@cathygellis; Lowering the Bar; earlier]
Student journalists are blogging dismissed professor Ward Churchill’s lawsuit against the Univ. of Colorado [Race to the Bottom via Ambrogi, Legal Blog Watch]

One Comment

“thinks it’s sin forbidden in Book of Leviticus”

Is there really a need to be reflexively anti-religious and make up details to a story? According to the story you link (and the story it links), she was apparently just clueless as to what “husbandry” meant — religion had nothing to do with it.
- March 17, 2009 10:38 AM
- By Ben