“New Business for Courts: Pet Custody”

by Walter Olson on March 12, 2009

“The [New Jersey appellate] panel declined to adopt a best-interests-of-the-pet standard as urged by amici in the case.” Judge Jane Grall wrote that in the absence of legally cognizable abuse or neglect to an animal, there might not be “judicially discoverable and manageable standards for resolving questions of possession from the perspective of a pet”. [New Jersey Law Journal]

Related posts

{ 1 comment }

1 AZFlyer 03.12.09 at 6:25 pm

I think the dog should go to whomever did NOT dress him up in that ridiculous outfit.

Comments on this entry are closed.