I would note that the linked article does not even attempt to answer the linking question with authority. Commenters pro and con provide no supported theories but do provide conflicting allegations of fact.
Thanks for clearing this up for us.
My favorite story in this ilk is the family (or municipality) which was compelled to cut a down a massive ‘nut tree’ – I don’t recall the species, walnut? -because on the block with the tree there lived (not adjacent to the tree) a family who were friends with a child with nut allergies who visited to swim in the family pool. The perceived problem – leaves or pollen fgrom the tree could enter the swimming pool water.
Mine is of a number of calls from parents who were “concerned” about smoking in the bowling alley I work at. This building is larger than a hockey rink, just to give perspective.
These calls asked if we had ionized all of our surfaces, starting with the carpets and walls, to get the “smell” of smoke out of the center, and went on from there, into second-hand smoke “allergies”, and so on.
I point this out, because these calls started coming nine months AFTER the smoking ban statewide went into effect in June ‘06.
And, I STILL get about one every couple of weeks even today! (Come to think of it, I was getting calls about this before the forced ban went into effect; the center policy was no smoking on Tuesday, Thursdays, Saturdays, or Sundays before 5PM. All of our birthday parties were on Saturdays and Sundays.)
Second-hand smoke (head shaking in disbelief) . . . if I put your kid’s group at one end, while someone is smoking at the other end (180 feet away), how is little Johnny/Janie going to notice? I have said before: I seriously doubt that your kid can inhale second-hand smoke from someone half a football field away, in a center with smoke-eaters and good air circulation; if a parent claims that the kid is allergic, most of the time they were never tested! (More than likely it’s hyper-sensitive parents who never grew up around a smoker or just can’t stand the smell themselves).
What’s next, “no-beer days” where the mere presence of kids in a building means no sale of beer or alcohol, on the fear of second-hand drinking??
And now with so-called THIRD-hand smoke (what the @%^$% is that??), what’s next?
A "new Associated Press poll says most Americans support curbs on medical malpractice lawsuits. The AP poll found that 54 percent favor making it harder to sue doctors and hospitals for mistakes taking care of patients, while 32 percent are... […]
Moving beyond judicial elections? Chamber's Institute for Legal Reform has a new report out (PDF) on the subject of "Best Practices in Judicial Merit Selection" More: Gavel Grab. Earlier: here, here, etc. Latest from the Jury Verdict Research people:... […]
After getting the mammoth $145 billion judgment against it thrown out on the grounds that each member of Florida's plaintiff smoker's class had to sue separately, the suits are coming in, and the latest verdict is not good news for... […]
There are lots of them, and they're bound to encourage more unionization among health care workers and others, according to this op-ed by A. Kevin Troutman of Fisher & Phillips for the Houston Chronicle.... […]
A local controversy here in Colorado involves an auto dealer who used the billboard on his property to ask the question ““PRESIDENT or JIHAD?” The rest of the billboard attempts (not very successfully in my view) to connect this question to the issue of Obama’s birth certificate. Last night I was briefly interviewed about the [...] […]
In a post below, Ilya writes: The traditional law school reliance on the the Socratic method, which I criticized on other grounds in this series of posts, is part of the problem. Many professors and students assume that it is the only correct way of teaching law classes, especially large intro courses, and therefore don’t bother [...] […]
One of the standard defenses of the Socratic method, which I criticized in my last post and here, is adherence to tradition. If American lawprofs have been using the method for decades, there must be something to it. Who are we to question the approach that worked so well for Professor Kingsfield? I am generally [...] […]
By nature, I am a highly verbal, nonvisual person. I learn best by reading books or listening to lectures. I rarely benefit from looking at tables, charts, pictures, and the like. I’m the kind of guy who can’t drive to an unfamiliar destination without a detailed mapquest itinerary telling me exactly which turns to take; [...] […]
{ 3 comments }
“What’s causing the rise of the killer peanut? ”
I would note that the linked article does not even attempt to answer the linking question with authority. Commenters pro and con provide no supported theories but do provide conflicting allegations of fact.
Thanks for clearing this up for us.
My favorite story in this ilk is the family (or municipality) which was compelled to cut a down a massive ‘nut tree’ – I don’t recall the species, walnut? -because on the block with the tree there lived (not adjacent to the tree) a family who were friends with a child with nut allergies who visited to swim in the family pool. The perceived problem – leaves or pollen fgrom the tree could enter the swimming pool water.
Mine is of a number of calls from parents who were “concerned” about smoking in the bowling alley I work at. This building is larger than a hockey rink, just to give perspective.
These calls asked if we had ionized all of our surfaces, starting with the carpets and walls, to get the “smell” of smoke out of the center, and went on from there, into second-hand smoke “allergies”, and so on.
I point this out, because these calls started coming nine months AFTER the smoking ban statewide went into effect in June ‘06.
And, I STILL get about one every couple of weeks even today! (Come to think of it, I was getting calls about this before the forced ban went into effect; the center policy was no smoking on Tuesday, Thursdays, Saturdays, or Sundays before 5PM. All of our birthday parties were on Saturdays and Sundays.)
Second-hand smoke (head shaking in disbelief) . . . if I put your kid’s group at one end, while someone is smoking at the other end (180 feet away), how is little Johnny/Janie going to notice? I have said before: I seriously doubt that your kid can inhale second-hand smoke from someone half a football field away, in a center with smoke-eaters and good air circulation; if a parent claims that the kid is allergic, most of the time they were never tested! (More than likely it’s hyper-sensitive parents who never grew up around a smoker or just can’t stand the smell themselves).
What’s next, “no-beer days” where the mere presence of kids in a building means no sale of beer or alcohol, on the fear of second-hand drinking??
And now with so-called THIRD-hand smoke (what the @%^$% is that??), what’s next?
Where did all of these kids come from? When I was a kid, absolutely every kid I knew ate peanut butter, and as far as I recall no one died from it.
Comments on this entry are closed.