If you guessed that this is another California disabled-access case, you’re right:
Chronicling the high cost of our legal system
by Walter Olson on April 27, 2009
If you guessed that this is another California disabled-access case, you’re right:
Tagged as: ADA filing mills, California

Individual liberty, free markets, and peace: the world's premier libertarian think tank. Publishes Cato at Liberty, where I blog on contemporary policy issues.
Get your copy today! My new book tackles the question of why so many bad ideas come from the law schools. "Cutting-edge commentary, hard-hitting, witty, astute." -- Publisher's Weekly. "Excellent... A fine dissection of these strangely powerful institutions" -- Wall Street Journal.
{ 3 comments }
How do these lawsuits work? Can anyone file, or do you have to be disabled? Does the ADA violation have to be relevant to your disability? For example, if you’re blind, can you sue because the mirror is 2″ too low?
Is there no duty to mitigate damages in ADA cases?
Did anyone ever ask the plaintiffs why they kept going back 27 times?
(It’s about the money, of course!)
Once again, a case in favor of modification or outright repeal of ADA.
Comments on this entry are closed.