<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: U.K. online-gambling site settles with Dept. of Justice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/04/uk-online-gambling-site-settles-with-dept-of-justice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com/2009/04/uk-online-gambling-site-settles-with-dept-of-justice/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:26:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert Clark</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2009/04/uk-online-gambling-site-settles-with-dept-of-justice/comment-page-1/#comment-45154</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 04:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=10386#comment-45154</guid>
		<description>Unfreakin real! How about the US starts taxing these websites instead of trying to punish them. They would make a heck of a lot more money that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfreakin real! How about the US starts taxing these websites instead of trying to punish them. They would make a heck of a lot more money that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Rogers</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2009/04/uk-online-gambling-site-settles-with-dept-of-justice/comment-page-1/#comment-44452</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 21:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=10386#comment-44452</guid>
		<description>My initial musings are to extend a generous but singular &quot;digital&quot; message to DOJ.  Next I wonder, if DOJ can reach &lt;i&gt;across the pond&lt;/i&gt; and shake down businesses retroactively, what&#039;s to stop them from building a target &lt;strike&gt;hit&lt;/strike&gt;list of all kinds of domestic businesses who they don&#039;t like?   As though they&#039;re not already doing it now.  Lastly, I wish I could have been a fly on the wall during the &lt;strike&gt;extortion&lt;/strike&gt;negotiation meetings to understand the business case made for paying this protection money as opposed to just closing up shop and moving to perhaps Zurich and starting over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My initial musings are to extend a generous but singular &#8220;digital&#8221; message to DOJ.  Next I wonder, if DOJ can reach <i>across the pond</i> and shake down businesses retroactively, what&#8217;s to stop them from building a target <strike>hit</strike>list of all kinds of domestic businesses who they don&#8217;t like?   As though they&#8217;re not already doing it now.  Lastly, I wish I could have been a fly on the wall during the <strike>extortion</strike>negotiation meetings to understand the business case made for paying this protection money as opposed to just closing up shop and moving to perhaps Zurich and starting over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

