<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Website ordered to pay $125,000 over ‘haunted’ mill claim&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/04/website-ordered-to-pay-125000-over-%e2%80%98haunted%e2%80%99-mill-claim/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com/2009/04/website-ordered-to-pay-125000-over-%e2%80%98haunted%e2%80%99-mill-claim/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=website-ordered-to-pay-125000-over-%25e2%2580%2598haunted%25e2%2580%2599-mill-claim</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 16:39:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: New York Injury Cases Blog</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2009/04/website-ordered-to-pay-125000-over-%e2%80%98haunted%e2%80%99-mill-claim/comment-page-1/#comment-47517</link>
		<dc:creator>New York Injury Cases Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 05:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=10582#comment-47517</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Blawg Review #209...&lt;/strong&gt;

Welcome to Blawg Review #209. This will not be our typical post where we discuss and analyze pain and suffering verdicts in personal injury cases; instead, in the long line of blawg review hosts before us, we have been asked......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Blawg Review #209&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Welcome to Blawg Review #209. This will not be our typical post where we discuss and analyze pain and suffering verdicts in personal injury cases; instead, in the long line of blawg review hosts before us, we have been asked&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Burgess</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2009/04/website-ordered-to-pay-125000-over-%e2%80%98haunted%e2%80%99-mill-claim/comment-page-1/#comment-46113</link>
		<dc:creator>John Burgess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=10582#comment-46113</guid>
		<description>How will the court distinguish damages done by talking about the ghosts from the damage done by the ghosts themselves? Maybe mill-oriented poltergeists took over the keyboards, blogging software, etc. purely in an act of self-defense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How will the court distinguish damages done by talking about the ghosts from the damage done by the ghosts themselves? Maybe mill-oriented poltergeists took over the keyboards, blogging software, etc. purely in an act of self-defense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.345 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-05-27 13:37:22 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
