“Top Illinois Court Axes Mandatory Retirement Law for State Judges”

by Walter Olson on June 24, 2009

They’ve got the Illinois Constitution — or at least their power to read things into the ambiguities and interstices of that document — and they’re not afraid to use it. [ABA Journal] Scott Greenfield has some comments on the equal protection ruling and its policy implications.

Related posts

{ 2 comments }

1 SmartDude 06.24.09 at 1:07 am

The very definition of judicial tyranny, not to mention hyper-corrupt Machine Politics.

2 Melvin H. 06.24.09 at 9:46 pm

Shouldn’t this be considered as a conflict of interest? Unless I missed something, here we have judges ruling on something that affects them directly–retirement age. I thought most judges would have to recuse themselves where there was a possibility or certainty that they would rule on things which affect them directly or indirectly.

Comments on this entry are closed.