http://overlawyered.com/2009/06/top-illinois-court-axes-mandatory-retirement-law-for-state-judges/ Chronicling the high cost of our legal system Wed, 15 Feb 2012 01:26:26 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 http://overlawyered.com/2009/06/top-illinois-court-axes-mandatory-retirement-law-for-state-judges/comment-page-1/#comment-51945 Melvin H. Thu, 25 Jun 2009 01:46:17 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/?p=11923#comment-51945 Shouldn't this be considered as a conflict of interest? Unless I missed something, here we have judges ruling on something that affects them directly--retirement age. I thought most judges would have to recuse themselves where there was a possibility or certainty that they would rule on things which affect them directly or indirectly. Shouldn’t this be considered as a conflict of interest? Unless I missed something, here we have judges ruling on something that affects them directly–retirement age. I thought most judges would have to recuse themselves where there was a possibility or certainty that they would rule on things which affect them directly or indirectly.

]]> http://overlawyered.com/2009/06/top-illinois-court-axes-mandatory-retirement-law-for-state-judges/comment-page-1/#comment-51747 SmartDude Wed, 24 Jun 2009 05:07:23 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/?p=11923#comment-51747 The very definition of judicial tyranny, not to mention hyper-corrupt Machine Politics. The very definition of judicial tyranny, not to mention hyper-corrupt Machine Politics.

]]>