<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tales of contingent-fee tax collection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/07/contingent-fee-tax-collection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com/2009/07/contingent-fee-tax-collection/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:26:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Litigiator</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2009/07/contingent-fee-tax-collection/comment-page-1/#comment-57982</link>
		<dc:creator>Litigiator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 16:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=12517#comment-57982</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a tasty little conflict of interest.

I recall another telephone class action: I was one day in the Circus Court of Cook County, Illinois, when I listened to a lawyer explaining to the judge about how Illinois Bell had apparently been shaving a fraction of a cent off every pay phone call, and this was hurting consumers.  The judge, incredulous, asked the lawyer just how he thought it might be possible to refund that fraction of a penny to each pay phone user.  The courtroom broke out in laughter.

Sad ending: I read sometime later that the case had settled.  No doubt coupons for free pay phone calls were distributed to anyone who submitted sufficient documentation of their pay phone calls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a tasty little conflict of interest.</p>
<p>I recall another telephone class action: I was one day in the Circus Court of Cook County, Illinois, when I listened to a lawyer explaining to the judge about how Illinois Bell had apparently been shaving a fraction of a cent off every pay phone call, and this was hurting consumers.  The judge, incredulous, asked the lawyer just how he thought it might be possible to refund that fraction of a penny to each pay phone user.  The courtroom broke out in laughter.</p>
<p>Sad ending: I read sometime later that the case had settled.  No doubt coupons for free pay phone calls were distributed to anyone who submitted sufficient documentation of their pay phone calls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

