<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Discovery overreach in Prop 8 battle?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/08/discovery-overreach-in-prop-8-battle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com/2009/08/discovery-overreach-in-prop-8-battle/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=discovery-overreach-in-prop-8-battle</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 17:39:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Deoxy</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2009/08/discovery-overreach-in-prop-8-battle/comment-page-1/#comment-68739</link>
		<dc:creator>Deoxy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=13268#comment-68739</guid>
		<description>As awful as that is, it&#039;s nice to see it being deployed on the conservative side for once.  If both sides used all available legal nastiness, I think what was &quot;available&quot; would shrink, which would be good.

That is, I view this similarly to how people occasionally talk about how to get rid of a bad law: thorough and even-handed enforcement.  As long as one side mostly plays nice, the laws won&#039;t be changed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As awful as that is, it&#8217;s nice to see it being deployed on the conservative side for once.  If both sides used all available legal nastiness, I think what was &#8220;available&#8221; would shrink, which would be good.</p>
<p>That is, I view this similarly to how people occasionally talk about how to get rid of a bad law: thorough and even-handed enforcement.  As long as one side mostly plays nice, the laws won&#8217;t be changed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Law Dork</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2009/08/discovery-overreach-in-prop-8-battle/comment-page-1/#comment-68239</link>
		<dc:creator>Law Dork</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 04:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=13268#comment-68239</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link.  Also, there&#039;s more there, in terms of potentially overreaching discovery descriptions -- and I&#039;ve posted the brief at the top of the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link.  Also, there&#8217;s more there, in terms of potentially overreaching discovery descriptions &#8212; and I&#8217;ve posted the brief at the top of the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.165 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-05-27 16:31:32 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
