<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EEOC sues Abercrombie &amp; Fitch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/09/eeoc-sues-abercrombie-fitch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com/2009/09/eeoc-sues-abercrombie-fitch/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=eeoc-sues-abercrombie-fitch</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 17:39:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Katie</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2009/09/eeoc-sues-abercrombie-fitch/comment-page-1/#comment-71980</link>
		<dc:creator>Katie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=13775#comment-71980</guid>
		<description>And yet again the press doens&#039;t know the difference between &quot;hijab&quot; and  the scarf.  I&#039;m not Muslim; I do know something about different kinds of head coverings.  The scarf is known as a &quot;niqab&quot;.   The word &quot;hijab&quot; is the standard of modesty for Muslim women.  Frankly I&#039;m not sure it can even be used in the singular, as &quot;a hijab&quot;....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And yet again the press doens&#8217;t know the difference between &#8220;hijab&#8221; and  the scarf.  I&#8217;m not Muslim; I do know something about different kinds of head coverings.  The scarf is known as a &#8220;niqab&#8221;.   The word &#8220;hijab&#8221; is the standard of modesty for Muslim women.  Frankly I&#8217;m not sure it can even be used in the singular, as &#8220;a hijab&#8221;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Dawn Wake</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2009/09/eeoc-sues-abercrombie-fitch/comment-page-1/#comment-71924</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Dawn Wake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 19:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=13775#comment-71924</guid>
		<description>@Jack Wilson  Modus tollens will tell us the same thing that reading the news does: there *is* no limit to what the feds can do, and in fact are doing.   The Constitution as a check on government power was lost some time ago and something like 90% of our current regulatory environment would have to be trashed to recover it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jack Wilson  Modus tollens will tell us the same thing that reading the news does: there *is* no limit to what the feds can do, and in fact are doing.   The Constitution as a check on government power was lost some time ago and something like 90% of our current regulatory environment would have to be trashed to recover it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Wilson</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2009/09/eeoc-sues-abercrombie-fitch/comment-page-1/#comment-71906</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=13775#comment-71906</guid>
		<description>How does the EEOC survive constitutional scrutiny? If the EEOC can exist, then there is no limit on what the feds can do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does the EEOC survive constitutional scrutiny? If the EEOC can exist, then there is no limit on what the feds can do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.112 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-05-27 16:46:11 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
