Man’s “defective underwear” suit against Hanes

by Walter Olson on October 26, 2009

It’s among the most wince-makingly embarrassing ever (not for the squeamish or prudish). [Above the Law; Freed v. Hanes, decision in PDF]

Related posts

{ 7 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Tom T. 10.26.09 at 3:16 pm

An opinion that will live forever as a testament to the exhibitionistic stupidity of some people.

What was up with footnote 3, in which a male attorney who just happened to be sitting in the courtroom was called upon to testify?

2 A.W. 10.26.09 at 3:18 pm

Well given that the Plaintiff had to admit that he was too fat to see his, um, appendage, thank god he got alot of money from the court to compensate him for that embarrassment.

Oh wait, he lost.. oh, um, nevermind.

normally it is wrong to laugh at a man for being fat, but in this case, let’s all make an exception.

3 A.W. 10.26.09 at 3:24 pm

Btw, i am surprised everyone missed that he won the trip by selling diet products!

4 Richard Nieporent 10.26.09 at 5:15 pm

We all know that his claim is bogus due to the shrinkage factor.

5 Richard Nieporent 10.26.09 at 5:17 pm
6 B. RAD 10.26.09 at 11:17 pm

Makes a man wanna go commando.

7 Benjamin 10.27.09 at 10:07 am

If something (especially that) hurts, you find out what is causing it and fix what is wrong. If it is in an inaccessible place, you will find a restroom immediately so you can look. At least a reasonable person would, which law is based on reasonable people.

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>