Billions in costs and who knows how many discontinued businesses and products later, the Consumer Product Safety Commission agrees it would be a good idea to do an economic impact analysis of CPSIA. [Commissioner Anne Northup]
Chronicling the high cost of our legal system
by Walter Olson on March 10, 2010
Billions in costs and who knows how many discontinued businesses and products later, the Consumer Product Safety Commission agrees it would be a good idea to do an economic impact analysis of CPSIA. [Commissioner Anne Northup]
Tagged as: CPSIA

Get your copy today! My new book tackles the question of why so many bad ideas come from the law schools. "Cutting-edge commentary, hard-hitting, witty, astute." -- Publisher's Weekly. "Excellent... A fine dissection of these strangely powerful institutions" -- Wall Street Journal.
Individual liberty, free markets, and peace: the world's premier libertarian think tank. Publishes Cato at Liberty, where I blog on contemporary policy issues.
Get smart with the Thesis WordPress Theme from DIY Themes.
{ 1 comment }
Economic impact is irrelevant if incidental lead was the hazard that activist claim it to be. The problem is that too many people, educated or not, can not distinguish between word pairing and thoughtful analysis. Nobody wants children to be poisoned by lead. But such poisoning did not – and could not – happen with the Chinese made toys. Kids do not eat dirt bikes or bicycle air valves either. Regardless of the economic impact, the law makes no sense.
The lady with the online bookstore was wrongly harmed. Nort because she is a really sweet person but because closing her down would not improve safety one wit. Even shews should be closed down by CPSIA either!
Comments on this entry are closed.