An important victory for British games blogger Bruce Everiss. [Guardian] Earlier here.
Chronicling the high cost of our legal system
by Walter Olson on April 3, 2010
An important victory for British games blogger Bruce Everiss. [Guardian] Earlier here.
Tagged as: Australia, libel slander and defamation, videogames

Individual liberty, free markets, and peace: the world's premier libertarian think tank. Publishes Cato at Liberty, where I blog on contemporary policy issues.
Get your copy today! My new book tackles the question of why so many bad ideas come from the law schools. "Cutting-edge commentary, hard-hitting, witty, astute." -- Publisher's Weekly. "Excellent... A fine dissection of these strangely powerful institutions" -- Wall Street Journal.
{ 2 comments }
It’s a shame that Everiss didn’t get a judgment, because the thugs who sued him dismissed their suit when the eventual outcome became apparent. (His barrister caught Evony’s star witness Benjamin Gifford lying about having a bachelor’s degree and an MBA among other things.) Then he’d have a strong argument for dismissal should they choose to sue him in the United Kingdom, which has ridiculous libel laws itself.
But the plaintiffs do owe Everiss $80.000 Australian as a result of their misadventure. A strong argument for “loser pays”, and a rebuke to the game-industry media who libeled Everiss (under Australian or British law) by reprinting Evony’s defamatory press release.
Everiss, having been put through the wringer, seems to be too much of a gentleman to sue.
Bah – this is the link I meant to post:
http://www.bruceongames.com/2010/03/31/evony-vs-bruce-everiss-the-result/
Comments on this entry are closed.