Two lawsuits filed last month claim that writers improperly based fictional characters on the complainants. [Matthew Heller, OnPoint News] A much noted case last November, in which a Georgia jury awarded $100,000 to a woman who said she had been wrongly used as the basis in part for a character in the novel “The Red Hat Club”, may have encouraged the filing of such suits.
Chronicling the high cost of our legal system
Cato Institute
Individual liberty, free markets, and peace: the world's premier libertarian think tank. Publishes Cato at Liberty, where I blog on contemporary policy issues.
Schools for Misrule
Get your copy today! My new book tackles the question of why so many bad ideas come from the law schools. "Cutting-edge commentary, hard-hitting, witty, astute." -- Publisher's Weekly. "Excellent... A fine dissection of these strangely powerful institutions" -- Wall Street Journal.
{ 1 trackback }
{ 5 comments }
Then why mention publicly that some material is factual if you’re writing fiction?
I write military science fiction and yes, I have based characters on people I knew during my time in the Navy. If I get sued, at least I’ll have the ridicule factor when I ask them on the stand if they ever flew around in spaceships. I do use different names and the descriptions are not the same.
“Yes, I am the frightful harridan who lies constantly and has sex with small domestic animals. ”
Bob
Writers are now falling into the sued if you do and sued if you don’t category.
Write an autobiography but add a little fiction – get sued.
Write a fictional story but add a little truth – get sued.
If I write a true story with a lot of fiction, does that make me a lawyer?
Stories have to come from SOMEWHERE. No story is entirely made up from someone’s imagination. This is getting to be silly.
Comments on this entry are closed.