Daniel Schwartz doesn’t think much of this private venture.
P.S. A moving target, it seems.
Chronicling the high cost of our legal system
by Walter Olson on July 19, 2010
Daniel Schwartz doesn’t think much of this private venture.
P.S. A moving target, it seems.
Tagged as: harassment law, lawyering vs. privacy

Individual liberty, free markets, and peace: the world's premier libertarian think tank. Publishes Cato at Liberty, where I blog on contemporary policy issues.
Get your copy today! My new book tackles the question of why so many bad ideas come from the law schools. "Cutting-edge commentary, hard-hitting, witty, astute." -- Publisher's Weekly. "Excellent... A fine dissection of these strangely powerful institutions" -- Wall Street Journal.
{ 1 trackback }
{ 3 comments }
I sure hope they have a good law firm on retainer, because they are going to need one when they get sued by people who are erroneously listed as sexual harassers.
mmm, i don’t know the exact intent in posting this, but it seems as if this is a case where our overly litigious society would do justice.
it sounds like a pretty horrible defamation website that will be shut down with the sheer number of suits very quickly.
Something tells me waving the Section 230 wand wouldn’t make the lawsuits go away. What a stupendously stupid idea.
Comments on this entry are closed.