Christopher Woodson says it would violate his religion to comply with a Waynesboro, Va. moving company’s haircut policy, so he’s appealed to the EEOC, which has filed a suit on his behalf. [Amanda Hess, TBD] More: Jon Hyman.
Christopher Woodson says it would violate his religion to comply with a Waynesboro, Va. moving company’s haircut policy, so he’s appealed to the EEOC, which has filed a suit on his behalf. [Amanda Hess, TBD] More: Jon Hyman.
6 Comments
Jacob Miller can sympathize with Woodson:
What in the constitution authorizes something called the EEOC?
I imagine the authorization comes from the grant of executive powers to the President.
I like “non-standard hairstyles could affect Lawrence’s ability to “provide the service expected by” these people”
What kind of services do you think customers expect that involves an employee’s hair?
The EEOC would like to see Woodson awarded… a position with Lawrence Transportation as a loader—hair intact.
What if Lawrence has already filled the vacancy? Will the EEOC force Lawrence to fire the current employee?
I would like a mover that does not look like he has bedbugs residing in the mess on top his head. I would not hire such a mover if i had the choice.
If it were a Sikh, would that change the equation?