The disclosure of a Pennsylvania judge’s email to interested parties in a politically charged redistricting case may have stalled his hopes for advancement to the federal bench. [The Legal Intelligencer]
Chronicling the high cost of our legal system
by Walter Olson on August 29, 2011
The disclosure of a Pennsylvania judge’s email to interested parties in a politically charged redistricting case may have stalled his hopes for advancement to the federal bench. [The Legal Intelligencer]
Tagged as: judges, Pennsylvania, politics

Individual liberty, free markets, and peace: the world's premier libertarian think tank. Publishes Cato at Liberty, where I blog on contemporary policy issues.
Get your copy today! My new book tackles the question of why so many bad ideas come from the law schools. "Cutting-edge commentary, hard-hitting, witty, astute." -- Publisher's Weekly. "Excellent... A fine dissection of these strangely powerful institutions" -- Wall Street Journal.
{ 1 comment }
“But I’m the only one who knows that and we don’t want to educate the other side on this and have them demand a [three-judge] panel instead.”
“Nealon did admit to ‘a lapse of ethical judgment….I went about it the wrong way. There’s no question about that.’”
The mind reels to think of the verbal paroxysm that’d come from Nan Aron if this were a Republican nominee.
Comments on this entry are closed.