A judge has ruled that the notice to class members of a class action over unsolicited faxes should be delivered by … fax [Christina Stueve, Madison County Record; related editorial]
Chronicling the high cost of our legal system
by Walter Olson on October 17, 2011
A judge has ruled that the notice to class members of a class action over unsolicited faxes should be delivered by … fax [Christina Stueve, Madison County Record; related editorial]
Tagged as: class actions, Madison County

Individual liberty, free markets, and peace: the world's premier libertarian think tank. Publishes Cato at Liberty, where I blog on contemporary policy issues.
Get your copy today! My new book tackles the question of why so many bad ideas come from the law schools. "Cutting-edge commentary, hard-hitting, witty, astute." -- Publisher's Weekly. "Excellent... A fine dissection of these strangely powerful institutions" -- Wall Street Journal.
{ 2 comments }
You truly cannot make this stuff up.
I am sure that justice will pevail, with such an insightful, cautiously honest judge.
Actually, Smart Dude, there is a logic here. First, presumably the class members are identifiable by fax number. They may not be identifiable by any other means. So this may be the best way to provide them notice. Second, a fax about the class action over unwanted faxes is not in the same “unwelcome” category as the underlying unwanted fax itself.
By the way, I’ve practiced in Judge Cueto’s courtroom, and he’s fair and very sharp.
Comments on this entry are closed.