- Washington Post pundit Dana Milbank’s lament: Obama isn’t doing enough to intimidate opponents [David Boaz, Cato]
- FDA defends itself against rising criticism on drug and device approval [NYT] NYT approaches the issue with a curious slant [Paul Rubin]
- California courts: what makes you think we need to follow SCOTUS on arbitration? [Cal Biz Lit, more, Russell Jackson] Senate anti-arbitration hearing could have used more truth in advertising [PoL]
- Pols want to fast-track favored L.A. stadium against environmental suits under California’s obstructor-friendly CEQA. Hmmm… why not fast-track everyone else too? [Gideon Kanner, Stephen Smith, SCPR, Paul Taylor, Examiner]
- State law forbids use of deadly force in defense of business property: “Burglar’s family awarded $300,000 in wrongful death suit” [Colorado Springs Gazette]
- One reason the Ninth Circuit may go off on more frolics: three-judge, one-clerk bench memos [Kerr]
Tagged as:
arbitration,
California,
criminals who sue,
environment,
FDA,
harassment law,
Ninth Circuit
{ 1 comment }
Don’t worry about the fact that this was a used car lot, and the shooters never gave the victims a chance to give themselves up. This is a chance to bash lawyers and tort law!
Would you prefer the shooters be in jail? Because from the news report you link to it looks as though they probably should.
Comments on this entry are closed.