The Art Newspaper takes up a trend we’ve noted before in this space:
In New York, the art lawyer Ronald Spencer, of Carter, Ledyard and Milburn, agrees with Sanig. “This is a very serious problem. Specialists are often academics earning $100,000 [or less] a year and they can’t afford litigation they are fearful of being a defendant in a lawsuit, even if they should win.” He admits that there are more of these cases in the US: “It’s a cliché, but we are more litigious here.” He says that the US system, whereby the plaintiff does not have to pay the legal fees of the successful defendant, encourages this.
{ 2 comments }
Ah, but what is the difference between a perfect copy and an original?
I think most art “experts” are faking it.
He “admits” there are more of these cases in the U.S.
I hate this. Why write “admits” when it underscores the thesis the author is making?
Comments on this entry are closed.