Sensationalist coverage devastated a niche sector of the meat processing industry, and now a group of companies are demanding $1.2 billion from various defendants including ABC News, Diane Sawyer, and a UCLA microbiologist over various alleged inaccuracies. South Dakota, where the case was filed, has passed something called the South Dakota Agricultural Food Products Disparagement Act, one of a genre of “food defamation” laws previously criticized in this space. [Popehat; Reuters, ABA Journal, Poynter]
4 Comments
Complaint: http://www.beefisbeef.com/2012/09/13/defamation-claim/
At 263 pages, that’s one of the longer complaints I’ve seen. It appears a single claim only falls under the “South Dakota Agricultural Food Products Disparagement Act. “
It’s long but cogent.
[…] Ag Gag Laws Suppress Free Speech and the Marketplace of Ideas” [Baylen Linnekin, earlier here, […]