Satire by Kyle Graham about some high-level legal-literary feuding.
Chronicling the high cost of our legal system
by Walter Olson on September 10, 2012
Satire by Kyle Graham about some high-level legal-literary feuding.
Tagged as: humor, Richard Posner, Supreme Court

Individual liberty, free markets, and peace: the world's premier libertarian think tank. Publishes Cato at Liberty, where I blog on contemporary policy issues.
Get your copy today! My new book tackles the question of why so many bad ideas come from the law schools. "Cutting-edge commentary, hard-hitting, witty, astute." -- Publisher's Weekly. "Excellent... A fine dissection of these strangely powerful institutions" -- Wall Street Journal.
{ 1 comment }
Scalia is right: common law methods are anachronistic in a modern statutory age. Posner is right: Scalia does not have a suitable substitute. Give up? No. Look abroad. In civil law countries they have been working on modern methods since the French Civil Code of 1804. Had only we paid more attention to David Dudley Field and less to James Carter. Had only the law schools not misled us with their worship of common law methods. Forgive me for suggesting (again) Maxeiner, James R., Scalia & Garner’s Reading Law: A Civil Law for the Age of Statutes? (August 18, 2012). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2132581
Comments on this entry are closed.