<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Copyright and D.C. lobbying: that was fast</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/2012/11/copyright-d-c-lobbying-fast/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com/2012/11/copyright-d-c-lobbying-fast/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=copyright-d-c-lobbying-fast</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 02:26:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugo S. Cunningham</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2012/11/copyright-d-c-lobbying-fast/comment-page-1/#comment-184739</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo S. Cunningham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 11:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=34225#comment-184739</guid>
		<description>Congress should pass an &quot;Internet free library national policy act,&quot; establishing the eventual objective that anyone with a computer link anywhere in the country should have the same access to information as a physical visitor to the Library of Congress.

As an initial step in line with that policy, Congress could rule that a bona-fide search data-base (eg. Google&#039;s) is not a copyright infringement.

Over the longer term, Congress might authorize a friendly expropriation of Google&#039;s scanning library, to deploy the negotiating power of the US government against excessive demands by copyright trolls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congress should pass an &#8220;Internet free library national policy act,&#8221; establishing the eventual objective that anyone with a computer link anywhere in the country should have the same access to information as a physical visitor to the Library of Congress.</p>
<p>As an initial step in line with that policy, Congress could rule that a bona-fide search data-base (eg. Google&#8217;s) is not a copyright infringement.</p>
<p>Over the longer term, Congress might authorize a friendly expropriation of Google&#8217;s scanning library, to deploy the negotiating power of the US government against excessive demands by copyright trolls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.118 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-06-18 00:52:34 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->