• Ninth Circuit dissent: ruling “jeopardizes academic freedom” by making it too easy for students to sue professors [WSJ Law Blog]
• When the bumptious and sociopathic go after our blogging friend, it’s Ken 1, b./s.-ers zero [Popehat]
• Uh-oh: “Election Results Seen as Victory for Business of Law” [Gina Passarella, The Legal Intelligencer]
• In the mail: “How to Feed a Lawyer: And Other Irreverent Observations from the Legal Underground” [Evan Schaeffer]
• “Cato Files Brief in the First Federal Appeal Regarding the Contraception Mandate” [Ilya Shapiro, earlier here, here, etc.]
• “Judicial independence” campaigners snooze through unfair attacks on D.C. Circuit [WSJ, earlier]
• “Anyone whose blood pressure needs a boost should check out Overlawyered…” [James DeLong, American Thinker]

Filed under: accolades, D.C. Circuit, legal blogs, Ninth Circuit