A win for property rights at SCOTUS

by Walter Olson on December 5, 2012

My Cato colleague Roger Pilon explains the significance of the Supreme Court’s ruling yesterday in Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United States, in which the federal government flooded a property owner’s land but resisted demands for compensation on the grounds that the “taking” of property was temporary, since the flooding would subside. Earlier here.

{ 1 comment }

1 Let _It_Burn 12.05.12 at 5:31 pm

They should have said that it would result in greater tax revenue like Kelo.

Comments on this entry are closed.