Comments on: Jeopardy: “New York Times editorials” for $100 http://overlawyered.com/2013/01/jeopardy-new-york-times-editorials-100/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=jeopardy-new-york-times-editorials-100 Chronicling the high cost of our legal system Thu, 20 Jun 2013 12:16:02 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4 By: Jeffrey Toobin on recess appointments - Overlawyered http://overlawyered.com/2013/01/jeopardy-new-york-times-editorials-100/comment-page-1/#comment-200041 Jeffrey Toobin on recess appointments - Overlawyered Thu, 31 Jan 2013 15:30:04 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/?p=35699#comment-200041 [...] Yorker’s readers deserve a better law analyst than Jeffrey Toobin? In his rant against the Canning decision, notes Ed Whelan, “Toobin asserts that there has never before been a ‘legal [...] [...] Yorker’s readers deserve a better law analyst than Jeffrey Toobin? In his rant against the Canning decision, notes Ed Whelan, “Toobin asserts that there has never before been a ‘legal [...]

]]> By: Kyle http://overlawyered.com/2013/01/jeopardy-new-york-times-editorials-100/comment-page-1/#comment-199892 Kyle Tue, 29 Jan 2013 03:16:26 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/?p=35699#comment-199892 Wally, I'll tell you basically the same thing I told Ted Frank when he objected to another New York Times story a while back -- I think it's quaint that you seem to believe that the Times still can be shamed back to editorial integrity. Wally,

I’ll tell you basically the same thing I told Ted Frank when he objected to another New York Times story a while back — I think it’s quaint that you seem to believe that the Times still can be shamed back to editorial integrity.

]]>