“This amendment would prohibit federal regulation of the size and quantity of food and beverages,” the Texas senator’s office explained of his budget proposal, which was not adopted by the Democratic majority. [Joel Gehrke, Washington Examiner]
Chronicling the high cost of our legal system
Cato Institute
Individual liberty, free markets, and peace: the world's premier libertarian think tank. Publishes Cato at Liberty, where I blog on contemporary policy issues.
Schools for Misrule
Get your copy today! My new book tackles the question of why so many bad ideas come from the law schools. "Cutting-edge commentary, hard-hitting, witty, astute." -- Publisher's Weekly. "Excellent... A fine dissection of these strangely powerful institutions" -- Wall Street Journal.
{ 3 comments }
You know Obama has his eye on Texas Toast.
I’d prefer an amendment that simply banned Michael Bloomberg from:
1. Holding any public office
2. Opening his mouth in public
3. Being Michael Bloomberg
4. Being photographed without a diaper and nursing bottle in his hands
I’ll settle for any one of the above.
In 2014, how someone voted on “the Big Gulp Act” may determine how many low-information voters vote, and so determine control of the Senate. A new wedge issue comes of age.
Comments on this entry are closed.