Supreme Court and constitutional law roundup

by Walter Olson on May 24, 2013

{ 1 comment }

1 Russell Cook (@questionAGW) 06.03.13 at 12:37 pm

On your #2 bulletpoint about the “SCOTUS denies certiorari…”, the Foley Hoag link is one where they conclude, “It’s going to take a sea change – as it were – before plaintiffs win one of these cases.”

My comment there (in case they don’t approve it) is verbatim here:

It would have taken more than a sea change before either of these cases stood a chance of staying afloat. Each one contained a ticking time bomb: “Global Warming Nuisance Lawsuits Are Based on a Fatal Flaw”

Comments on this entry are closed.