“Race-based claims thrown out in Paula Deen lawsuit”

by Walter Olson on August 13, 2013

The deposition-extracted tidbits were enough to bring down Deen’s culinary empire, but that doesn’t mean they were actually relevant to anyone’s legal case against her: “U.S. District Court Judge William T. Moore Jr. ruled Monday that [Lisa] Jackson, who is white, has no standing to sue them [Deen and her brother] for race discrimination.” [USA Today]

{ 2 comments }

1 Jamie r 08.13.13 at 8:49 am

The weird thing to me is that the allegations sat in the plaintiff’s complaint for about a year and no one cared. It was only when Deen’s lawyers quited Deen’s deposition in a filing that it really hit the fan. That strikes me as bad defense lawyering.

2 Mike 08.13.13 at 9:29 am

I do not understand, then, why Deen had to testify about this subject. In NY, e.g., objections are generally reserved for after the deposition, but I would think you would be within your rights to refuse to answer a clearly irrelevant/scandalous question and ask a judge to rule on it. You would risk sanctions if the judge ruled against you, which might have been an acceptable risk in Deen’s case.

Comments on this entry are closed.