- Far-reaching, little-discussed new regulation: Stewart Baker on NIST rules mandating cybersecurity at private enterprises [Volokh; first, second, third, fourth posts]
- “Ominous Developments on the Internet Governance Front” [David Post]
- “The Exaggeration Of The Cyberbullying Problem Is Harming Anti-Bullying Efforts” [Tim Cushing, TechDirt]
- “Will California’s New Data Breach Notification Duty Stimulate Class Action Litigation?” [Glenn Lammi, WLF]
- Some thoughts on how the law should treat domestic drones, public and private [Kenneth Anderson]
- Privacy lawsuit against Gmail could do a lot of damage [Mike Masnick, TechDirt; Matt Powers, CEI “Open Market”, parts one, two]
- Warning: more efforts ahead from legal academia to come up with stringent liability schemes for software makers [New Republic and Lawfare]
Filed under: bullying, Google, privacy, technology, terrorism
One Comment
The NIST guidelines are not a “new regulation” and Baker is being dishonest is saying so. Its also telling that Baker refuses to allow comments on Volokh. Which tells you a lot about his approach of “debate” his unsupportable opinions about what he thinks NIST does.