Argument: plaintiff should have used marijuana after crash

by Walter Olson on March 6, 2014

A court in British Columbia, Canada, has declined to reduce a plaintiff’s damages on the theory she could have alleviated symptoms after a collision by using medical marijuana but didn’t. [Erik Magraken] More: Ron Miller.

{ 1 comment }

1 wfjag 03.06.14 at 6:32 pm

Comments on this entry are closed.