Supreme Court and constitutional law roundup

Should a sock used to hold pills count as “drug paraphernalia?” [NPR via Jeffrey Miron on Supreme Court case]
Michael Greve: on Medicaid spending-forcing suits, behold the Obama administration taking the correct stance, U.S. Chamber the wrong [Liberty and Law, more]
No, the justices don’t just use religious freedom cases to advance their own beliefs [Eugene Volokh]
Can/should the courts correct misconduct by the EEOC in dealings with employers during the “conciliation” phase before litigation? [Robert Barnes/Washington Post, Julie Goldscheid/SCOTUSBlog, Michael Greve on oral argument in Mach Mining v. EEOC]
Decision in Dart Cherokee case rejects presumption against removal of class actions [Richard Samp and M.C. Sungaila, WLF]
When if ever may the President properly sign legislation he believes to be in part unconstitutional? [Will Baude]
Most Justices have had little practical exposure to criminal law which can leave it a blind spot for them [Radley Balko]