<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Overlawyered &#187; Caleb O. Brown</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/author/caleb-o-brown/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:22:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>SCOTUS will hear voter ID case</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2007/12/scotus-will-hear-voter-id-case/</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2007/12/scotus-will-hear-voter-id-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 19:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caleb O. Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/index.php/2007/12/scotus-will-hear-voter-id-case/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Merry Christmas! The Supreme Court has agreed to hear the &#8220;<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/24/AR2007122401892.html">most politically divisive case since Bush v. Gore</a>&#8221; in 2000.</p>
<p>The simple question is whether we, as voters, can be constitutionally compelled to presented government-issued ID in order to vote.</p>
No tags for this post.
	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li>No related posts.</li>
	</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2007/12/scotus-will-hear-voter-id-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The #1 Threat to Respectability for Lawyers: Bears</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2007/12/the-1-threat-to-respectability-for-lawyers-bears/</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2007/12/the-1-threat-to-respectability-for-lawyers-bears/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 02:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caleb O. Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chasing clients]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/index.php/2007/12/the-1-threat-to-respectability-for-lawyers-bears/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Colbert&#8217;s ThreatDown recently included a law firm&#8217;s ad that included, yes, bears. In the ad, a bear is holding a small child, as if to suggest that the firm has struck the right balance between, I suppose, bloodthirst and coddling. The fair and balanced ad critique from a WSJ law blog reader:
“As long as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen Colbert&#8217;s ThreatDown recently included a law firm&#8217;s ad that included, yes, bears. In the ad, a bear is holding a small child, as if to suggest that the firm has struck the right balance between, I suppose, bloodthirst and coddling. The fair and balanced ad critique from a <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2007/12/18/the-law-blog-ad-of-the-year-binghams-bear-baby/">WSJ law blog</a> reader:</p>
<blockquote><p>“As long as <a href="http://www.bingham.com/">Bingham</a> is allowed to advertise with a bear holding a baby, personal-injury lawyers should be able to do whatever they want.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Clever as the ad is, it really is no different than the woman who morphs into a tiger for an ad I&#8217;ve seen in Louisville. It&#8217;s not <em>much</em> different from the ads featuring another local plaintiff&#8217;s attorney lifting a car. That ad, I believe, is syndicated among dozens of lawyers across the country.</p>
<p>I wonder, though, if Bingham thought to include the standard disclaimer at the bottom of its ad, &#8220;Not an actual client. Also, bear is not a member of the bar.&#8221;</p>
<p>(crossposted at <a href="http://catallaxy.net">catallaxy.net</a>)</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/chasing-clients/" title="chasing clients" rel="tag">chasing clients</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/11/%e2%80%9ci%e2%80%99ve-always-thought-people-would-be-very-concerned-if-they-knew-what-we-were-doing%e2%80%9d/" title="“I’ve always thought people would be very concerned if they knew what we were doing” (November 9, 2009)">“I’ve always thought people would be very concerned if they knew what we were doing”</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2006/07/youtube-lawyer-ads/" title="YouTube lawyer ads (July 19, 2006)">YouTube lawyer ads</a> (3)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/05/you-found-your-lawyer-_how_/" title="You found your lawyer _how_? (May 23, 2010)">You found your lawyer _how_?</a> (1)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2004/10/willie-gary-marketing-tactics/" title="Willie Gary marketing tactics (October 13, 2004)">Willie Gary marketing tactics</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2007/07/william-shatner-lawyer-ads/" title="William Shatner lawyer ads (July 30, 2007)">William Shatner lawyer ads</a> (1)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2007/12/the-1-threat-to-respectability-for-lawyers-bears/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Suing for a better education</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2007/12/suing-for-a-better-education/</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2007/12/suing-for-a-better-education/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 01:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caleb O. Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/index.php/2007/12/suing-for-a-better-education/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The old joke goes something like this: If you go to law school, graduate, sue the school for providing a poor education, represent yourself and then win the case &#8230; did you <em>really</em> deserve to win?</p>
<p>The cases detailed <a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1197885885993">here</a> may not be quite as clear cut.</p>
<blockquote><p>A group of students filed a $120 million class action against the American Justice School of Law in Paducah, Ky., on Nov. 17, citing allegations that include tax fraud, false representation to the American Bar Association, racketeering, scheming to defraud students and obstruction of justice. Rust v. American Justice School of Law, No. 5:07CV-191-R (W.D. Ky.).</p>
<p>Late last month, Adam Key, a second-year law student, sued Regent University School of Law, a private Christian school in Virginia Beach, Va., claiming violations of his right to free speech and religion after getting expelled for posting a critique in an online university forum. Key v. Regent University, No. 4:07-CV-04060 (S.D. Texas).</p>
<p>On Nov. 14, John Valente, a second-year student at University of Dayton School of Law in Ohio, filed a complaint against his school, citing negligence in dealing with exam software. Valente v. University of Dayton Law School of Law, No. 07-9593 (Montgomery Co., Ohio, Ct. C.P.).</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s far from being a trend (yet!), but shouldn&#8217;t we expect a more costly legal education to generate demands from those students who slog it out to be chosen from an ever-increasing pool of applicants?</p>
<p>Law school tuition has been increasing at a considerable clip. And if you don&#8217;t graduate, it doesn&#8217;t matter to you if the value of the degree has risen twice as fast. You&#8217;re not a lawyer. (&#8221;<a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1197885885993">Don&#8217;t Like Your Grade? Sue Your Law School</a>,&#8221; The National Law Journal, Dec. 18, 2007.)</p>
<p><strong>Update</strong>: I&#8217;m not a lawyer, either.</p>
<p>(crossposted at <a href="http://catallaxy.net">catallaxy.net</a>)</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/free-speech/" title="free speech" rel="tag">free speech</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/law-schools/" title="law schools" rel="tag">law schools</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/ohio/" title="Ohio" rel="tag">Ohio</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/11/update-lawprof-drops-suit-against-students/" title="Update: lawprof drops suit against students (November 18, 2008)">Update: lawprof drops suit against students</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/09/september-23-roundup-2/" title="September 23 roundup (September 23, 2009)">September 23 roundup</a> (1)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/early-years/september-2000-archives-part-2/" title="September 2000 archives, part 2 (September 20, 2000)">September 2000 archives, part 2</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/04/online-speech-symposium-at-concurring-opinions/" title="Online-speech symposium at Concurring Opinions (April 15, 2009)">Online-speech symposium at Concurring Opinions</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/early-years/october-2002-archives-part-2/" title="October 2002 archives, part 2 (October 20, 2002)">October 2002 archives, part 2</a> (0)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2007/12/suing-for-a-better-education/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

