Overlawyered » Beatles http://overlawyered.com Chronicling the high cost of our legal system Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:28:52 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 en hourly 1 Yoko Ono vs. Ben Stein http://overlawyered.com/2008/05/yoko-ono-vs-ben-stein/ http://overlawyered.com/2008/05/yoko-ono-vs-ben-stein/#comments Wed, 21 May 2008 20:29:32 +0000 Walter Olson http://overlawyered.com/?p=7020 Can’t-they-both-please-lose? dept.: Columbia’s Tim Wu is confident that excepting 15 seconds of Lennon’s Imagine for purposes of criticizing it will count as fair use, which one may hope would be true without necessarily predicting that the courts will agree (WSJ law blog, May 20; earlier).

Tags: , , ,

Related posts

]]> http://overlawyered.com/2008/05/yoko-ono-vs-ben-stein/feed/ 1 “Judge awards Heather Mills £24.3 million in divorce ruling” http://overlawyered.com/2008/03/judge-awards-heather-mills-243-million-in-divorce-ruling/ http://overlawyered.com/2008/03/judge-awards-heather-mills-243-million-in-divorce-ruling/#comments Mon, 17 Mar 2008 19:26:35 +0000 Walter Olson http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=5987 Indicating perhaps that divorcing Paul McCartney is an only slightly less remunerative affair than being Bear Stearns, even if she didn’t get the claimed £125 million. (David Byers, Times Online, Mar. 17). Reader Jim T. sends along this video of Mills’s press statement and describes as “hilarious” the “references of how it is ‘very, very sad’ that her daughter was only awarded enough travel expenses to travel ‘B class’ even though Heather Mills was just awarded $50 million dollars.” (& welcome Above the Law readers).

Tags: , , , ,

Related posts

]]> http://overlawyered.com/2008/03/judge-awards-heather-mills-243-million-in-divorce-ruling/feed/ 0 James Lileks on copyright law http://overlawyered.com/2006/12/james-lileks-on-copyright-law/ http://overlawyered.com/2006/12/james-lileks-on-copyright-law/#comments Sat, 02 Dec 2006 00:04:35 +0000 Walter Olson http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=4243 From his syndicated column (”Obliging the Entertainment Industry Poobahs”, Newhouse, Nov. 29):
Think of all the unauthorized copyrighted material you have in your head right now: Beatles tunes, Stephen King plots, images of Mickey Mouse.

Thief!

Well, you’re not exactly a criminal — but give it time.

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act has just been amended again, and if the changes make the entertainment industry happy, that does not bode well for your future.

Tomorrow the law may be amended to prevent you from reading Doonesbury while moving your lips, since that’s an unauthorized reproduction that shifts content from one form to another….

Tags: ,

Related posts

]]> http://overlawyered.com/2006/12/james-lileks-on-copyright-law/feed/ 2 The Overlawyered iMix http://overlawyered.com/2005/08/the-overlawyered-imix/ http://overlawyered.com/2005/08/the-overlawyered-imix/#comments Tue, 09 Aug 2005 00:19:38 +0000 Ted Frank http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=2504 On August 25, a San Mateo County court will hold a fairness hearing over a nationwide class action settlement over iPod batteries that will provide $50 coupons for class members and $2,768,000 in fees for the attorneys. Because the lawsuit was filed before the Class Action Fairness Act took effect, the state court does not have to comply with the new federal requirement that attorneys’ fees reflect the actual redeemed value of the coupons, rather than the face value, one of many sensible provisions of the Act that trial lawyers, the New York Times, and dozens of prominent Democrats (including leading 2008 presidential contenders Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, and John Edwards) opposed. In honor of this fairness hearing (as well as in honor of a pending lawsuit alleging that Apple is monopolizing the music market by selling music in a proprietary format), Overlawyered presents the Overlawyered iMix:


If you’re coming here from another site, please do check out our main page.

1. The Verve, “Bittersweet Symphony.” The Verve’s band name reflects a change incurred by a lawsuit over the original band-name, “Verve”; when they finally got a big hit in “Bittersweet Symphony,” they were sued by ABKCO for their use of four bars from the symphonic version of the Rolling Stones’ “The Last Time,” and turned over all the royalties in settlement, getting only a token for the forty-seven tracks they added to the composition.

2. The Tokens, “The Lion Sleeps Tonight.” In 1996, the Tokens belatedly sued over their 1961 contract, complaining they had been deprived of royalties. As we documented Jun. 14, 2000, their attorneys were sanctioned for trying to manufacture evidence to keep the suit within the statute of limitations.

3. Gilberto, “The Girl from Ipanema.” Heloise Pinheiro inspired this 1960s hit, and was sued by the songwriters when she opened a boutique with the same name. (Aug. 15, 2001)

4. Aqua, “Barbie Girl.” Mattel sued over the song and lost; MCA countersued for defamation, complaining about Mattel’s use of the term “theft,” and also lost. Judge Kozinski wrote an entertaining opinion.

5. JibJab, “This Land Is Your Land.” Woody Guthrie’s heirs threatened suit, and backed off under bad publicity. (Jul. 29, 2004)

6. John Fogerty, “Centerfield.” Play it loud, in honor of Fogerty’s victory in a lawsuit accusing him of injuring a concertgoer’s hearing. (Aug. 12, 2004)

7 & 8. Janet Jackson, “What’ll I Do”; George Michael, “Waiting For That Day.” Jackson sang “Hey hey hey, that’s what I say,” Michael sang “You can’t always get what you want,” and both had to pay the Rolling Stones part of the rights to their songs to settle a resulting lawsuit claiming rights to those respective seven-word combinations. (Allen Klein of ABKCO, was not only behind these lawsuits and the Verve lawsuit mentioned in #1, but was also involved in a 1970 lawsuit between Paul McCartney and the rest of the Beatles.) Jackson went on to be sued over her breast exposure at the Super Bowl. (Feb. 5, 2004 and links therein)

9. Snoop Dogg, “Pimp Slapp’d.” Another sampling lawsuit, this one based on an answering-machine message. (Feb. 5, 2004)

10. Trick Daddy, “I’m a Thug.” This album was the subject of class-action lawsuits alleging that the clean version wasn’t sufficiently clean. (Dec. 13)

11. Eminem, “Brain Damage.” DeAngelo Bailey only subjected himself to more bad publicity when he sued over his presence in a song about bullying. (Apr. 18)

12. Eminem, “Guilty Conscience.” A sample on this song resulted in a 2003 lawsuit. (Smoking Gun, Sep. 16, 2003).

13. Beastie Boys, “Pass the Mic.” The band won a lawsuit over their use of a four-note flute sample, which you can hear in the 30-second free clip. Newton v. Diamond (9th Cir. 2004).

14. OutKast from Aquemini. Rosa Parks, under the influence of publicity-seeking attorneys happy to squander her civil-rights legacy in ludicrous litigation, sued the band over the song “Rosa Parks,” got a sympathetic Sixth Circuit to rule in her favor in an appalling decision, and this might be why the popular song is not on iTunes. (Apr. 15)

What litigation-related songs should be on the next edition of the Overlawyered iMix?

Tags: , , , , , ,

Related posts

]]> http://overlawyered.com/2005/08/the-overlawyered-imix/feed/ 11