<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Overlawyered &#187; fans as infringers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/fans-as-infringers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:22:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Fans can&#8217;t use Illinois mascot</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2010/10/fans-cant-use-illinois-mascot/</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2010/10/fans-cant-use-illinois-mascot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 15:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colleges and universities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fans as infringers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=19739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A Chief Illiniwek performance planned for homecoming weekend has been postponed indefinitely after the University of Illinois threatened legal sanction.&#8221; [Champaign-Urbana News-Gazette] Update: sponsors plan to proceed anyway.

	Tags: colleges and universities, fans as infringers, Illinois

	Related posts
	
	Yale adopts submissive posture in Title-IX-vs.-speech case (2)
	Xbox 360 lawsuit bogus? (0)
	Will litigation kill academic tenure? (3)
	White House race roundup [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A Chief Illiniwek performance planned for homecoming weekend has been postponed indefinitely after the University of Illinois threatened legal sanction.&#8221; [<a href="http://www.news-gazette.com/sports/illini-sports/football/2010-10-14/legal-costs-halt-plans-chiefs-next-dance.html">Champaign-Urbana News-Gazette</a>] <strong>Update</strong>: sponsors <a href="http://www.news-gazette.com/news/environment/2010-10-15/chiefs-next-dance-back.html">plan to proceed anyway</a>.</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/colleges-and-universities/" title="colleges and universities" rel="tag">colleges and universities</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/fans-as-infringers/" title="fans as infringers" rel="tag">fans as infringers</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/illinois/" title="Illinois" rel="tag">Illinois</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/04/yale-adopts-submissive-posture-in-title-ix-vs-speech-case/" title="Yale adopts submissive posture in Title-IX-vs.-speech case (April 16, 2011)">Yale adopts submissive posture in Title-IX-vs.-speech case</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2006/01/xbox-360-lawsuit-bogus/" title="Xbox 360 lawsuit bogus? (January 3, 2006)">Xbox 360 lawsuit bogus?</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/04/will-litigation-kill-academic-tenure/" title="Will litigation kill academic tenure? (April 10, 2008)">Will litigation kill academic tenure?</a> (3)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/01/white-house-race-roundup/" title="White House race roundup (January 8, 2008)">White House race roundup</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2007/10/white-house-race/" title="White House race (October 26, 2007)">White House race</a> (0)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2010/10/fans-cant-use-illinois-mascot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>September 21 roundup</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2010/09/september-21-roundup-2/</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2010/09/september-21-roundup-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 13:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alienation of affection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baltimore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fans as infringers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louisiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philadelphia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=19307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Facing four harassment claims, embattled Philadelphia housing chief files his own suit for $600K+ [Inquirer] 
&#8220;Ohio State Abuses Trademark Law to Suppress a Fan Magazine and Website&#8221; [Paul Alan Levy, CL&#038;P] 
&#8220;Judge Dismisses Baltimore Blight Suit Against Wells Fargo, Will Allow Refiling&#8221; [ABA Journal] 
Trial lawyer taking behind-the-scenes hand in Louisiana politics [OpenSecrets via Tapscott] [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>Facing four harassment claims, embattled Philadelphia housing chief files his own suit for $600K+ [<a href="http://www.philly.com/philly/news/20100908_Greene_suit_says_PHA_ruined_reputation.html">Inquirer</a>] </li>
<li>&#8220;Ohio State Abuses Trademark Law to Suppress a Fan Magazine and Website&#8221; [<a href="http://pubcit.typepad.com/clpblog/2010/09/ohio-state-abuses-trademark-law-to-suppress-a-fan-magazine-and-website.html">Paul Alan Levy, CL&#038;P</a>] </li>
<li>&#8220;Judge Dismisses Baltimore Blight Suit Against Wells Fargo, Will Allow Refiling&#8221; [<a href="http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/judge_dismisses_baltimore_blight_suit_against_wells_fargo_with_leave_to_ref/">ABA Journal</a>] </li>
<li>Trial lawyer taking behind-the-scenes hand in Louisiana politics [<a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2010/08/a-trial-lawyer-embraces-the-approac.html">OpenSecrets</a> via <a href="http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/Stuart-H-Smith-may-be-the-most-powerful-Louisiana-trial-lawyer-you-dont-know-101712408.html">Tapscott</a>] </li>
<li>&#8220;Are hedge funds abusing bankruptcy?&#8221; [<a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/09/07/are-hedge-funds-abusing-bankruptcy/">Felix Salmon</a> and <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703309704575413643530508422.html">WSJ</a>] </li>
<li>North Carolina alienation-of-affection law strikes again: “&#8217;Mistress Ordered to Pay $5.8 Million&#8217; to Wronged Wife&#8221; [<a href="http://volokh.com/2010/09/10/mistressed-ordered-to-pay-5-8-million-to-wronged-wife/">Volokh</a>, <a href="http://althouse.blogspot.com/2010/09/woman-gets-58-million-in-damages-from.html">Althouse</a>] </li>
<li>&#8220;Lawyers take a haircut on a contingency fee in Colorado&#8221; [<a href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2010/08/lawyers-take-a-haircut-on-a-contingency-fee-in-colorado.html">Legal Ethics Forum</a>] </li>
<li>ADA lawsuits close another beloved eatery [Stockton, Calif.; <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2004/09/ada-suits-close-another-beloved-eatery/">six years ago on Overlawyered</a>]  </li>
</ul>

	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/alienation-of-affection/" title="alienation of affection" rel="tag">alienation of affection</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/baltimore/" title="Baltimore" rel="tag">Baltimore</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/bankruptcy/" title="bankruptcy" rel="tag">bankruptcy</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/fans-as-infringers/" title="fans as infringers" rel="tag">fans as infringers</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/louisiana/" title="Louisiana" rel="tag">Louisiana</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/north-carolina/" title="North Carolina" rel="tag">North Carolina</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/philadelphia/" title="Philadelphia" rel="tag">Philadelphia</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/trademarks/" title="trademarks" rel="tag">trademarks</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/early-years/october-2000-archives-part-1/" title="October 2000 archives, part 1 (October 10, 2000)">October 2000 archives, part 1</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/early-years/october-1999-archives-part-2/" title="October 1999 archives, part 2 (October 31, 1999)">October 1999 archives, part 2</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/early-years/march-2000-archives-part-2/" title="March 2000 archives, part 2 (March 31, 2000)">March 2000 archives, part 2</a> (1)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/early-years/june-2001-archives-part-3/" title="June 2001 archives, part 3 (June 30, 2001)">June 2001 archives, part 3</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/early-years/january-2001-archives-part-2/" title="January 2001 archives, part 2 (January 20, 2001)">January 2001 archives, part 2</a> (0)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2010/09/september-21-roundup-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NFL trademark lawyers vs. New Orleans t-shirt sellers</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2010/01/nfl-trademark-lawyers-vs-new-orleans-t-shirt-sellers/</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2010/01/nfl-trademark-lawyers-vs-new-orleans-t-shirt-sellers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fans as infringers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=15827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unauthorized use of &#8220;Who Dat?&#8221; and a fleur-de-lis.  [Peter Finney, Times-Picayune/NOLA] More: and a cartoon. 

	Tags: fans as infringers, football, trademarks

	Related posts
	
	September 21 roundup (1)
	Notre Dame to Kansas high school: drop that fighting leprechaun logo (14)
	Mustang club calendars (4)
	June 11 roundup (16)
	Annals of sports trademarks (2)


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unauthorized use of &#8220;Who Dat?&#8221; and a fleur-de-lis.  [<a href="http://www.nola.com/saints/index.ssf/2010/01/who_dat_belongs_to_the_ages_no.html">Peter Finney, Times-Picayune/NOLA</a>] <strong>More</strong>: and a <a href="http://nmisscommentor.com/2010/01/31/times-picayune-cartoonist-on-the-nfls-claim-on-who-dat-nation/">cartoon</a>. </p>

	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/fans-as-infringers/" title="fans as infringers" rel="tag">fans as infringers</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/football/" title="football" rel="tag">football</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/trademarks/" title="trademarks" rel="tag">trademarks</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/09/september-21-roundup-2/" title="September 21 roundup (September 21, 2010)">September 21 roundup</a> (1)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/10/notre-dame-to-kansas-high-school-drop-that-fighting-leprechaun/" title="Notre Dame to Kansas high school: drop that fighting leprechaun logo (October 21, 2011)">Notre Dame to Kansas high school: drop that fighting leprechaun logo</a> (14)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/01/mustang-club-calendars/" title="Mustang club calendars (January 28, 2008)">Mustang club calendars</a> (4)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2007/06/june-11-roundup/" title="June 11 roundup (June 11, 2007)">June 11 roundup</a> (16)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/01/annals-of-sports-trademarks/" title="Annals of sports trademarks (January 6, 2010)">Annals of sports trademarks</a> (2)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2010/01/nfl-trademark-lawyers-vs-new-orleans-t-shirt-sellers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Annals of sports trademarks</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2010/01/annals-of-sports-trademarks/</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2010/01/annals-of-sports-trademarks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 12:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fans as infringers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=15416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two Chicago grocery store chains, Jewel and Dominick&#8217;s, bought full-page ads in &#8220;a special commemorative issue of Sports Illustrated magazine dedicated to [Michael] Jordan and his career&#8221;. The ads saluted the Chicago Bulls great for his achievements. Jordan proceeded to sue them for trademark infringement.  [Chicago Breaking Sports, Tactical IP via Legal Satyricon]

	Tags: Chicago, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two Chicago grocery store chains, Jewel and Dominick&#8217;s, bought full-page ads in &#8220;a special commemorative issue of Sports Illustrated magazine dedicated to [Michael] Jordan and his career&#8221;. The ads saluted the Chicago Bulls great for his achievements. Jordan proceeded to sue them for trademark infringement.  [<a href="http://www.chicagobreakingsports.com/2009/12/michael-jordan-sues-jewel-dominicks.html">Chicago Breaking Sports</a>, <a href="http://tacticalip.com/2009/12/31/michael-jordan-sues-grocery-stores-for-trademark-infringement-after-they-congratulate-him/">Tactical IP</a> via <a href="http://randazza.wordpress.com/2010/01/05/streisand-101/">Legal Satyricon</a>]</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/chicago/" title="Chicago" rel="tag">Chicago</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/fans-as-infringers/" title="fans as infringers" rel="tag">fans as infringers</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/sports/" title="sports" rel="tag">sports</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/trademarks/" title="trademarks" rel="tag">trademarks</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2006/10/washington-redskins-nickname-deemed-offensive/" title="Washington Redskins nickname deemed offensive (October 30, 2006)">Washington Redskins nickname deemed offensive</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2007/10/update-baseball-players-cant-sue-over-fantasy-baseball-statistics/" title="Update: Baseball players can&#8217;t sue over fantasy baseball statistics (October 23, 2007)">Update: Baseball players can&#8217;t sue over fantasy baseball statistics</a> (9)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/02/tweet-ye-not/" title="Tweet ye not (February 25, 2010)">Tweet ye not</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/06/the-phrase-chicago-2016/" title="The phrase &#8220;Chicago 2016&#8243; (June 2, 2009)">The phrase &#8220;Chicago 2016&#8243;</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2007/01/the-big-game/" title="The Big Game (January 31, 2007)">The Big Game</a> (7)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2010/01/annals-of-sports-trademarks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Companies vs. their fans: Pez sues Pez museum</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2009/07/companies-vs-their-fans-pez-sues-pez-museum/</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2009/07/companies-vs-their-fans-pez-sues-pez-museum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 14:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fans as infringers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=12178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The famous maker of candies and candy-dispensers is suing the owners of the Burlingame Museum of Pez Memorabilia in Northern California, claiming that its venture into Pez homage, which includes a Guinness-record largest replica of a Pez dispenser, infringe the firm&#8217;s trademarks and &#8220;deceive the public into thinking that the museum is operating under the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The famous maker of candies and candy-dispensers is suing the owners of the Burlingame Museum of Pez Memorabilia in Northern California, claiming that its venture into Pez homage, which includes a Guinness-record largest replica of a Pez dispenser, infringe the firm&#8217;s trademarks and &#8220;deceive the public into thinking that the museum is operating under the authority of Pez.&#8221;  [<a href="http://www.insidebayarea.com/sanmateocountytimes/localnews/ci_12716029">San Mateo County Times</a> via <a href="http://laughingsquid.com/pez-suing-burlingame-museum-of-pez-memorabilia/">Doctor Popular/Laughing Squid</a> and <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2009/07/06/pez-candy-inc-sues-m.html">BoingBoing</a>] On Pez&#8217;s jealousy of its name, see <a href="http://overlawyered.com/early-years/october-1999-archives-part-2/#991016b">this 1999 post</a>; more on fans-as-infringers <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/fans-as-infringers/">here</a>. </p>
<p><strong>More</strong>: Ron Coleman is <a href="http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=2847">being disrespectful</a> (&#8221;You can&#8217;t <em>handle</em> a real Pez museum&#8221;); <a href="http://amlawdaily.typepad.com/amlawdaily/2009/07/dispense-this.html">Brian Baxter, AmLaw Daily</a>. </p>

	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/fans-as-infringers/" title="fans as infringers" rel="tag">fans as infringers</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2006/06/whatever-happened-to-the-nitpickers-guides/" title="Whatever happened to the Nitpicker&#8217;s Guides? (June 9, 2006)">Whatever happened to the Nitpicker&#8217;s Guides?</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/05/update-bbc-backs-off/" title="Update: BBC backs off (May 17, 2008)">Update: BBC backs off</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2007/10/update-baseball-players-cant-sue-over-fantasy-baseball-statistics/" title="Update: Baseball players can&#8217;t sue over fantasy baseball statistics (October 23, 2007)">Update: Baseball players can&#8217;t sue over fantasy baseball statistics</a> (9)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2007/09/september-4-roundup/" title="September 4 roundup (September 4, 2007)">September 4 roundup</a> (1)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/09/september-21-roundup-2/" title="September 21 roundup (September 21, 2010)">September 21 roundup</a> (1)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2009/07/companies-vs-their-fans-pez-sues-pez-museum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Is fan fiction legal? Fans are understandably nervous.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2008/07/is-fan-fiction-legal-fans-are-understandably-nervous/</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2008/07/is-fan-fiction-legal-fans-are-understandably-nervous/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 17:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fans as infringers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;many commentators, and indeed, many fans themselves, operate on the rueful assumption that fan fiction does in fact infringe copyright.
Undaunted by this, Rebecca Tushnet, a professor of law at Georgetown University, and a keen fan fiction writer herself, wants to take fan fiction out of the legal shadows where it has operated, more or less [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8230;many commentators, and indeed, many fans themselves, operate on the rueful assumption that fan fiction does in fact infringe copyright.</p>
<p>Undaunted by this, Rebecca Tushnet, a professor of law at Georgetown University, and a keen fan fiction writer herself, wants to take fan fiction out of the legal shadows where it has operated, more or less at sufferance, for decades, and carve out a legal place for it within the US doctrine of fair use. She has recently helped found the Organization for Transformative Use, with the mandate to establish fan fiction within the parameters of legal, non-infringing use. </p></blockquote>
<p>(Grace Westcott, &#8220;Friction over Fan Fiction&#8221;, Literary Review of Canada, <a href="http://lrc.reviewcanada.ca/index.php?page=Friction-over-Fan-Fiction">Jul./Aug.</a>, via <a href="http://www.aldaily.com/">A&#038;L Daily</a>; our posts on <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/fans-as-infringers/">fans as infringers</a>).</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/copyright/" title="copyright" rel="tag">copyright</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/fans-as-infringers/" title="fans as infringers" rel="tag">fans as infringers</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/publishers/" title="publishers" rel="tag">publishers</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2006/06/whatever-happened-to-the-nitpickers-guides/" title="Whatever happened to the Nitpicker&#8217;s Guides? (June 9, 2006)">Whatever happened to the Nitpicker&#8217;s Guides?</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/01/what-could-have-been-entering-the-public-domain-this-month/" title="What could have been entering the public domain this month? (January 11, 2011)">What could have been entering the public domain this month?</a> (8)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/08/wall-street-bull-sculpture/" title="Wall Street &#8220;Bull&#8221; sculpture (August 2, 2009)">Wall Street &#8220;Bull&#8221; sculpture</a> (1)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2006/06/the-bloomsday-litigants/" title="The Bloomsday litigants (June 16, 2006)">The Bloomsday litigants</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2007/09/september-4-roundup/" title="September 4 roundup (September 4, 2007)">September 4 roundup</a> (1)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2008/07/is-fan-fiction-legal-fans-are-understandably-nervous/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update: BBC backs off</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2008/05/update-bbc-backs-off/</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2008/05/update-bbc-backs-off/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 18:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[fans as infringers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=6945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From its pursuit of the knitting-pattern Doctor Who fan. (Telegraph, May 17; earlier).

	Tags: fans as infringers, United Kingdom

	Related posts
	
	&#8220;Doctor Who&#8217;s new enemy: the BBC lawyers&#8221; (1)
	£300 billion worth of long memories (0)
	£204.53 dispute, £350,000 cost of defense (0)
	Window box menace averted (0)
	When a Holy Saint sues (0)


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From its pursuit of the knitting-pattern Doctor Who fan. (Telegraph, <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/1970937/BBC-withdraws-Doctor-Who-fan-legal-action.html">May 17</a>; <a href="http://overlawyered.com/index.php/2008/05/doctor-whos-new-enemy-the-bbc-lawyers/">earlier</a>).</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/fans-as-infringers/" title="fans as infringers" rel="tag">fans as infringers</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/united-kingdom/" title="United Kingdom" rel="tag">United Kingdom</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/05/doctor-whos-new-enemy-the-bbc-lawyers/" title="&#8220;Doctor Who&#8217;s new enemy: the BBC lawyers&#8221; (May 14, 2008)">&#8220;Doctor Who&#8217;s new enemy: the BBC lawyers&#8221;</a> (1)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/02/300-billion-worth-of-long-memories/" title="£300 billion worth of long memories (February 4, 2010)">£300 billion worth of long memories</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2005/05/20453-dispute-350000-cost-of-defense/" title="£204.53 dispute, £350,000 cost of defense (May 5, 2005)">£204.53 dispute, £350,000 cost of defense</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2004/10/window-box-menace-averted/" title="Window box menace averted (October 27, 2004)">Window box menace averted</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/11/when-a-holy-saint-sues/" title="When a Holy Saint sues (November 8, 2010)">When a Holy Saint sues</a> (0)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2008/05/update-bbc-backs-off/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Doctor Who&#8217;s new enemy: the BBC lawyers&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2008/05/doctor-whos-new-enemy-the-bbc-lawyers/</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2008/05/doctor-whos-new-enemy-the-bbc-lawyers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 16:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadcasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fans as infringers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=6840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A Doctor Who fan who gave away knitting patterns which created vague recreations of the programme&#8217;s aliens has been threatened with legal action by the BBC for copyright infringement.&#8221; (Andy Bloxham, Daily Telegraph, May 14). More: Times Online.

	Tags: broadcasters, copyright, fans as infringers, United Kingdom

	Related posts
	
	Why there aren&#8217;t DVDs of some of your favorite old [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A Doctor Who fan who gave away knitting patterns which created vague recreations of the programme&#8217;s aliens has been threatened with legal action by the BBC for copyright infringement.&#8221; (Andy Bloxham, Daily Telegraph, <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1953364/Doctor-Who%27s-new-enemy-the-BBC-lawyers.html">May 14</a>). More: <a href="http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/tv_and_radio/article3926859.ece">Times Online</a>.</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/broadcasters/" title="broadcasters" rel="tag">broadcasters</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/copyright/" title="copyright" rel="tag">copyright</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/fans-as-infringers/" title="fans as infringers" rel="tag">fans as infringers</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/united-kingdom/" title="United Kingdom" rel="tag">United Kingdom</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2006/10/why-there-arent-dvds-of-some-of-your-favorite-old-tv-series/" title="Why there aren&#8217;t DVDs of some of your favorite old TV series (October 13, 2006)">Why there aren&#8217;t DVDs of some of your favorite old TV series</a> (29)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2006/06/whatever-happened-to-the-nitpickers-guides/" title="Whatever happened to the Nitpicker&#8217;s Guides? (June 9, 2006)">Whatever happened to the Nitpicker&#8217;s Guides?</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2004/05/update-not-the-date-they-expected/" title="Update: not the date they expected (May 26, 2004)">Update: not the date they expected</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/05/update-bbc-backs-off/" title="Update: BBC backs off (May 17, 2008)">Update: BBC backs off</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/10/timeless-mysteries-of-rights-assertion-images-of-stonehenge/" title="Timeless mysteries of rights-assertion: images of Stonehenge (October 21, 2010)">Timeless mysteries of rights-assertion: images of Stonehenge</a> (3)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2008/05/doctor-whos-new-enemy-the-bbc-lawyers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>J.K. Rowling vs. fan guide trial</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2008/04/jk-rowling-vs-fan-guide-trial/</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2008/04/jk-rowling-vs-fan-guide-trial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 21:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fans as infringers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=6094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The famous author testified in a Manhattan courtroom in her case against RDR Books, publisher of a &#8220;Harry Potter Lexicon&#8221; that her lawyers say is at best a derivative knock-off of her work; the WSJ law blog&#8217;s Dan Slater has coverage here, here, and here. We covered the suit Jan. 29.

	Tags: copyright, fans as infringers

	Related [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The famous author testified in a Manhattan courtroom in her case against RDR Books, publisher of a &#8220;Harry Potter Lexicon&#8221; that her lawyers say is at best a derivative knock-off of her work; the WSJ law blog&#8217;s Dan Slater has coverage <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2008/04/14/harry-potter-lexicon-case-an-faq/">here</a>, <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2008/04/14/jk-rowling-on-the-stand-theres-a-measure-of-principle-at-stake/">here</a>, and <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2008/04/14/day-1-of-the-harry-potter-trial-rowling-holds-her-own/">here</a>. We covered the suit <a href="http://www.overlawyered.com/2008/01/harry-potter-inc-vs-fan-guides.html">Jan. 29</a>.</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/copyright/" title="copyright" rel="tag">copyright</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/fans-as-infringers/" title="fans as infringers" rel="tag">fans as infringers</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2006/06/whatever-happened-to-the-nitpickers-guides/" title="Whatever happened to the Nitpicker&#8217;s Guides? (June 9, 2006)">Whatever happened to the Nitpicker&#8217;s Guides?</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2007/09/september-4-roundup/" title="September 4 roundup (September 4, 2007)">September 4 roundup</a> (1)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2005/03/pro-sports-intellectual-property/" title="Pro sports &#038; intellectual property (March 8, 2005)">Pro sports &#038; intellectual property</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/01/harry-potter-inc-vs-fan-guides/" title="Harry Potter, Inc., vs. fan guides (January 19, 2008)">Harry Potter, Inc., vs. fan guides</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/02/harry-potter-fan-guides-contd/" title="Harry Potter fan guides, cont&#8217;d (February 12, 2008)">Harry Potter fan guides, cont&#8217;d</a> (0)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2008/04/jk-rowling-vs-fan-guide-trial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Harry Potter fan guides, cont&#8217;d</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2008/02/harry-potter-fan-guides-contd/</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2008/02/harry-potter-fan-guides-contd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 00:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fans as infringers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=5852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Times business columnist Joe Nocera weighs in (&#8221;A Tight Grip Can Choke Creativity&#8221;, New York Times, Feb. 9). Earlier: Jan. 19.

	Tags: copyright, fans as infringers

	Related posts
	
	Whatever happened to the Nitpicker&#8217;s Guides? (0)
	September 4 roundup (1)
	Pro sports &#038; intellectual property (0)
	J.K. Rowling vs. fan guide trial (0)
	Harry Potter, Inc., vs. fan guides (2)


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Times business columnist Joe Nocera weighs in (&#8221;A Tight Grip Can Choke Creativity&#8221;, New York Times, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/09/business/09nocera.html">Feb. 9</a>). Earlier: <a href="http://www.overlawyered.com/2008/01/harry_potter_inc_vs_fan_guides.html">Jan. 19</a>.</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/copyright/" title="copyright" rel="tag">copyright</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/fans-as-infringers/" title="fans as infringers" rel="tag">fans as infringers</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2006/06/whatever-happened-to-the-nitpickers-guides/" title="Whatever happened to the Nitpicker&#8217;s Guides? (June 9, 2006)">Whatever happened to the Nitpicker&#8217;s Guides?</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2007/09/september-4-roundup/" title="September 4 roundup (September 4, 2007)">September 4 roundup</a> (1)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2005/03/pro-sports-intellectual-property/" title="Pro sports &#038; intellectual property (March 8, 2005)">Pro sports &#038; intellectual property</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/04/jk-rowling-vs-fan-guide-trial/" title="J.K. Rowling vs. fan guide trial (April 14, 2008)">J.K. Rowling vs. fan guide trial</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/01/harry-potter-inc-vs-fan-guides/" title="Harry Potter, Inc., vs. fan guides (January 19, 2008)">Harry Potter, Inc., vs. fan guides</a> (2)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2008/02/harry-potter-fan-guides-contd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

