Related posts

• Life after the Florida governorship (3)
• Schwartz Zweben and the Ms. Wheelchair pageant, cont’d (10)
• February 19 roundup (0)
• Erin Brockovich in Florida (5)
• Call a chiropractor’s 1-800 accident hotline… (0)

Related posts

• From Florida governor to TV lawyer pitchman (3)
• Wisconsin’s “Vanna White veto” (0)
• Who arranged those leniency letters, anyway? (2)
• Whited sepulchre watch (1)
• Watch what you tell your hairdresser, cont’d (5)

Related posts

• May 8 roundup (3)
• June 13 roundup (3)
• January 18 roundup (9)
• August 17 roundup (4)
• April 2000 archives, part 2 (1)

Related posts

• Balloting results (1)
• Wounded in shootout, sheriff’s deputies sue widow (13)
• Worker’s comp in California (1)
• Wisconsin’s “Vanna White veto” (0)
• Wife: city improperly demoted hubby for dating subordinate (2)

Randy Castro is in the first grade. But, at the ripe old age of 6, he’s been declared a sex offender by Potomac View Elementary School. He’s guilty of sexual harassment, and the incident report will remain on his record for the rest of his school days – and maybe beyond.

Maybe it’ll be one of those things that just keeps turning up on background checks forever and ever: Perhaps 34-year-old Randy Castro will apply for a job, and at his prospective employer’s computer up will pop his sexual-harasser status yet again. Or maybe he’ll be able to keep it hushed up until he’s 57 and runs for governor of Virginia, and suddenly his political career self-detonates when the sordid details of his Spitzeresque sexual pathologies are revealed.

(”Attack of the preschool perverts”, syndicated/Orange County Register, Apr. 12; Brigid Schulte, “For Little Children, Grown-Up Labels As Sexual Harassers”, Washington Post, Apr. 3). A contrary view (letter to the editor from Cynthia Terrell of Takoma Park, Md., WaPo, Apr. 5): “The Post showed appalling insensitivity to the inappropriate nature of Randy Castro’s act. …our culture remains largely indifferent to privacy and harassment issues involving gender.”

Related posts

• October 2002 archives, part 3 (1)
• “Felony sexual abuse” (6)
• Whited sepulchre watch (1)
• Toronto schools: Halloween insensitive to witches (4)
• Spitzer, Faso, and the New York high court (0)

• Well, at least he cleaned up Wall Street; so runs one common valedictory to Spitzer, but Prof. Bainbridge begs to differ (Mar. 13)(and see links at my Point of Law roundup last week).
• “Should Spitzer really go to jail because of the way he took his own cash out of the bank?” asks Larry Ribstein (Mar. 11). And indeed bank “Know Your Customer” regulations, of which I’ve been critical for a good long time, might now come in for much needed scrutiny (Jack Balkin, Balkinization, Mar. 13; see also). One public figure who likewise faced the prospect of a “money laundering” indictment when personal weaknesses led him into surreptitious payments was ideological antipode Rush Limbaugh, Megan McArdle reminds us (Nov. 24, 2003).
• Last week’s New York Times article laying out Spitzer’s big crusade against the sex trade, and his successful push for a law lengthening sentences for “johns”, was powerful enough on its own terms. But isn’t it curious that the Times exclusively and at length quoted the feminist and legal-services groups who worked as Spitzer’s allies in that crusade, while not quoting a single source critical of the harsher penalties? Stephen Chapman has one corrective view [syndicated/Chicago Tribune, Mar. 13].
• Toronto law blogger Garry Wise says that unless Spitzer was diverting public moneys his fall constitutes “just another political lynching by the Monica brigade”, a sentiment I find sufficiently wrong-headed that I’m provoked to jump in with a comment [Wise Law Blog]. P.S. Wise says he was referring not to the governor’s downfall, but to his potential overcharging.
• How’d the press find out that “Client #9″ was the governor of New York? All signs point to a prosecution leak — the sort of underhanded tactic that should be left to the likes of, well, the departing governor himself [Frum, National Post]. Plus: Don’t assume that all the ill-advised leaks came from the prosecution side [Beldar]
• Should “Kristen” sue AP and other press outlets for swiping her MySpace pics, she might prove formidable in court: “It’s not often you get a case where there’s someone in the room with a higher hourly rate than the lawyers.” [Steyn @ NRO "Corner"].
• One reader said he had to check Overlawyered to see whether a certain story was true or a parody, so please rest assured: it’s only a parody (Jason Roth, “Spitzer Sues Prostitute Over Sex Addiction”, Save the Humans, Mar. 11).

Related posts

• Whited sepulchre watch (1)
• Eliot Smurfer (1)
• Timothy Balducci, wannabe? (1)
• Spitzer, Faso, and the New York high court (0)
• Spitzer now regulating airlines (0)

Related posts

• Spitzer endnotes (2)
• Eliot Smurfer (1)
• Timothy Balducci, wannabe? (1)
• Spitzer, Faso, and the New York high court (0)
• Spitzer now regulating airlines (0)

Spitzer last year had wanted to wire transfer more than $10,000 from his branch to what turned out to be the front for the prostitution ring, QAT Consulting Group, which also uses a number of other names, in New Jersey, the sources said.

But Spitzer had the money broken down into several smaller amounts of less than $10,000 each, apparently to avoid federal regulations requiring the reporting of the transfer of $10,000 or more, the sources said. The regulations are aim to help spot possible illegal business activities, such as fraud or drug deals.

Apparently, having second thoughts about even sending the total amount in this manner, Spitzer then asked that the bank take his name off the wires, the sources said.

Bank officials declined, however, saying that it was improper to do so and in any event, it was too late to do so, because the money already had been sent, the sources said.

The bank, as is required by law, filed an SAR, or Suspicious Activity Report, with the Internal Revenue Service, reporting the transfer of the money that exceeded $10,000, but had been broken down into smaller amounts, the sources said.

“The bank did the right thing,” said one source familiar with the situation. The name of the bank could not immediately be determined.

But the source added that “we then got lucky” in singling out Spitzer and the ring.

Millions of SARs are generated each week and flow into the Internal Revenue Service nationwide, but an analyst at the regional IRS office in Hauppauge [L.I.] noted Spitzer’s particular SAR and singled it out for attention to criminal investigators, the sources said.

The assumption, the sources said, was that Spitzer was being victimized either by a blackmailer or an impostor. The agents also speculated that perhaps the governor was involved in some sort of political corruption, the sources said.

Beldar (writing a day or two ago; note his update and caveats in an excellent post today):

If there were no other organized crime connections, that’s the kind of crime that might well result in a no-prison time recommendation and sentencing calculation for a first offender pleading guilty and cooperating.

AP also covers the smurfing charges, while Scott Greenfield has thoughts on the gradual erosion of financial privacy; I opined on some related matters in Reason a while back. WSJ law blog and Andrew McCarthy @ NRO discuss other charges that prosecutors might conceivably deploy against the governor. McCarthy, incidentally, contends that “innocent people in legitimate cash businesses have no concern” from the reporting requirements, which is not what I’ve heard.

More details from Wednesday’s NYT: It appears bank Suspicious Activities Reports separately directed investigators’ interest to Spitzer’s transactions and to the escort service front, QAT Consulting, and then the two investigations converged. “When he was New York State’s attorney general, Mr. Spitzer himself used the reports [SARs] to make his cases.”

Earlier here.

Related posts

• April 2000 archives, part 1 (1)
• Whited sepulchre watch (1)
• Timothy Balducci, wannabe? (1)
• Spitzer endnotes (2)
• September 2001 archives, part 3 (0)

“[U]nlimited damages … could have a significant impact on state and local budgets, since government entities are not infrequently named as defendants in wrongful death suits, and there are similar concerns as the State undertakes efforts to attract and grow businesses here.”

“Unfortunately, I do not believe that this bill in its current form strikes a fair balance that would avoid using a strict monetary valuation of a person’s life while also addressing the adverse effect of allowing unlimited and unpredictable damages.”

He urged the Legislature to consider alternatives “granting more flexibility for courts to reduce excessive non-pecuniary damage awards and defining non-pecuniary damages less expansively.”

[NJ Law Journal/law.com; earlier: Jan. 9]

Related posts

• Democratic candidates and tort reform (1)
• Wisconsin’s “Vanna White veto” (0)
• Welcome New York Times readers (1)
• Upwardly mobile GOP trial lawyers, cont’d (0)
• Update: N.J. pols plan revenge on docs (2)

(Updated to reflect fact bill has not been signed yet.)

Related posts

• September 2001 archives, part 3 (0)
• September 1999 archives, part 1 (0)
• Retailers Settle Katrina Gas-Price Suits (1)
• October 2000 archives, part 3 (0)
• October 1999 archives, part 2 (2)