<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Overlawyered &#187; hotels</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/hotels/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 14:01:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Motel owner 99% liable for murder</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2012/05/motel-owner-99-liable-for-murder/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=motel-owner-99-liable-for-murder</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2012/05/motel-owner-99-liable-for-murder/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 12:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hotels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joint and several liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[third party liability for crime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=29619</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;[An Indiana appeals] court has found that an ever so slightly negligent (2%) business owner needs to pay for 99% of the harm caused by a murderer. Citing the Restatement (Third) of Torts. Section 14, a public policy in favor of adequately compensating the wronged &#8230; and the difficulty murderers have in procuring insurance to [...]</p><p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2012/05/motel-owner-99-liable-for-murder/">Motel owner 99% liable for murder</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;[An Indiana appeals] court has found that an ever so slightly negligent (2%) business owner needs to pay for 99% of the harm caused by a murderer. Citing the Restatement (Third) of Torts. Section 14, a public policy in favor of adequately compensating the wronged &#8230; and the difficulty murderers have in procuring insurance to cover their rampages, the appellate court in <a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=15402933027401342205">Santelli v. Rahmatulla</a> found that the Restatement provides a handy way of escaping Indiana&#8217;s reform of its joint and several liability rule.&#8221; [<a href="http://www.masstortsstateoftheart.com/2012/04/articles/the-law/1-of-the-fault-to-plaintiff-2-to-the-negligent-tortfeasor-and-97-percent-to-the-intentional-tortfeasor-means-99-of-the-liability-to-the-negligent-tortfeasor/">David Oliver</a>] <strong>More</strong>: <a href="http://www.pointoflaw.com/archives/2012/05/indiana-court-nullifies-statutory-limitation-on-joint-and-several-liability.php">Point of Law</a> (motel &#8220;[adhered] to the non-discriminatory EEOC principle of not performing criminal background checks&#8221;).</p>
<div class="sharing"><div class="sharing-button"><div class="fb-like" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2012/05/motel-owner-99-liable-for-murder/" data-send="true" data-layout="button_count" data-show-faces="false"></div></div>
<div class="sharing-button"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="horizontal" data-via="overlawyered" data-related="walterolson" data-text="Motel owner 99% liable for murder" data-url="http://overlawyered.com/2012/05/motel-owner-99-liable-for-murder/">Tweet</a></div>
<div class="sharing-button gplus"><div class="g-plus" data-action="share" data-annotation="bubble" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2012/05/motel-owner-99-liable-for-murder/"></div></div></div>
	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/hotels/" title="hotels" rel="tag">hotels</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/indiana/" title="Indiana" rel="tag">Indiana</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/joint-and-several-liability/" title="joint and several liability" rel="tag">joint and several liability</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/third-party-liability-for-crime/" title="third party liability for crime" rel="tag">third party liability for crime</a><br />
<p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2012/05/motel-owner-99-liable-for-murder/">Motel owner 99% liable for murder</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2012/05/motel-owner-99-liable-for-murder/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hotel pools and the ADA: a 60-day deadline extension</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2012/03/hotel-pools-and-the-ada-a-60-day-deadline-extension/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=hotel-pools-and-the-ada-a-60-day-deadline-extension</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2012/03/hotel-pools-and-the-ada-a-60-day-deadline-extension/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 11:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disabled rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hotels]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=28352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Following a substantial outcry (see Mar. 14), the Department of Justice has announced a 60-day stay of its new regulations requiring costly lifts and other fixes at hotel pools. It will also consider a six-month extension to address what it insufferably describes as &#8220;misunderstandings regarding compliance with these ADA requirements.&#8221; Translation: &#8220;opponents were persuading the [...]</p><p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2012/03/hotel-pools-and-the-ada-a-60-day-deadline-extension/">Hotel pools and the ADA: a 60-day deadline extension</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Following a substantial outcry (see <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2012/03/ada-everyone-out-of-the-pool/">Mar. 14</a>), the Department of Justice has announced a 60-day stay of its new regulations requiring costly lifts and other fixes at hotel pools. It will also consider a six-month extension to address what it insufferably describes as &#8220;misunderstandings regarding compliance with these ADA requirements.&#8221; Translation: &#8220;opponents were persuading the public that the mandate was unreasonable.&#8221; Hotel and insurance officials had confirmed that many operators were considering closing pools or smaller water features such as whirlpools, which must often be given their own separate permanent lift installations under the rules.  [<a href="http://travel.usatoday.com/hotels/post/2012/03/hotel-pool-lifts-deadlines-here-confusion-persists/648998/1">Barbara De Lollis, USA Today</a>] On the notion that it doesn&#8217;t pay lawyers to sue over uncompliant hotel pools, see this <a href="http://ehotelier.com/hospitality-news/item.php?id=A11075_0_11_0_M">2007 coverage</a> of what was even then a busy litigation docket in California and elsewhere.</p>
<div class="sharing"><div class="sharing-button"><div class="fb-like" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2012/03/hotel-pools-and-the-ada-a-60-day-deadline-extension/" data-send="true" data-layout="button_count" data-show-faces="false"></div></div>
<div class="sharing-button"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="horizontal" data-via="overlawyered" data-related="walterolson" data-text="Hotel pools and the ADA: a 60-day deadline extension" data-url="http://overlawyered.com/2012/03/hotel-pools-and-the-ada-a-60-day-deadline-extension/">Tweet</a></div>
<div class="sharing-button gplus"><div class="g-plus" data-action="share" data-annotation="bubble" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2012/03/hotel-pools-and-the-ada-a-60-day-deadline-extension/"></div></div></div>
	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/disabled-rights/" title="disabled rights" rel="tag">disabled rights</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/hotels/" title="hotels" rel="tag">hotels</a><br />
<p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2012/03/hotel-pools-and-the-ada-a-60-day-deadline-extension/">Hotel pools and the ADA: a 60-day deadline extension</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2012/03/hotel-pools-and-the-ada-a-60-day-deadline-extension/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hotel chain will pay $132,500 for dismissing autistic desk clerk</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2011/11/hotel-chain-will-pay-132500-for-dismissing-autistic-desk-clerk/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=hotel-chain-will-pay-132500-for-dismissing-autistic-desk-clerk</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2011/11/hotel-chain-will-pay-132500-for-dismissing-autistic-desk-clerk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2011 18:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[autism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disabled rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hotels]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=25922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The EEOC says Comfort Suites dismissed the clerk when it should instead have accepted the services of a state-paid &#8220;job coach&#8221; who might have &#8220;helped the clerk learn to master his job by using autism-specific training techniques.&#8221; [EEOC press release, Fox San Diego] Tweet Tags: autism, disabled rights, EEOC, hotels</p><p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/11/hotel-chain-will-pay-132500-for-dismissing-autistic-desk-clerk/">Hotel chain will pay $132,500 for dismissing autistic desk clerk</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The EEOC says Comfort Suites dismissed the clerk when it should instead have accepted the services of a state-paid &#8220;job coach&#8221; who might have &#8220;helped the clerk learn to master his job by using autism-specific training techniques.&#8221; [<a href="http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/release/11-7-11a.cfm">EEOC press release</a>, <a href="http://www.fox5sandiego.com/news/kswb-hotel-autism-settlement,0,2972379.story">Fox San Diego</a>]</p>
<div class="sharing"><div class="sharing-button"><div class="fb-like" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/11/hotel-chain-will-pay-132500-for-dismissing-autistic-desk-clerk/" data-send="true" data-layout="button_count" data-show-faces="false"></div></div>
<div class="sharing-button"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="horizontal" data-via="overlawyered" data-related="walterolson" data-text="Hotel chain will pay $132,500 for dismissing autistic desk clerk" data-url="http://overlawyered.com/2011/11/hotel-chain-will-pay-132500-for-dismissing-autistic-desk-clerk/">Tweet</a></div>
<div class="sharing-button gplus"><div class="g-plus" data-action="share" data-annotation="bubble" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/11/hotel-chain-will-pay-132500-for-dismissing-autistic-desk-clerk/"></div></div></div>
	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/autism/" title="autism" rel="tag">autism</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/disabled-rights/" title="disabled rights" rel="tag">disabled rights</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/eeoc/" title="EEOC" rel="tag">EEOC</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/hotels/" title="hotels" rel="tag">hotels</a><br />
<p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/11/hotel-chain-will-pay-132500-for-dismissing-autistic-desk-clerk/">Hotel chain will pay $132,500 for dismissing autistic desk clerk</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2011/11/hotel-chain-will-pay-132500-for-dismissing-autistic-desk-clerk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Class action: I thought USA Today at my hotel was free</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2011/08/class-action-i-thought-usa-today-at-my-hotel-was-free/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=class-action-i-thought-usa-today-at-my-hotel-was-free</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2011/08/class-action-i-thought-usa-today-at-my-hotel-was-free/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 18:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class actions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hotels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=24116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A guest at a Hilton hotel in Santa Rosa who was upset that he was billed 75 cents for a newspaper he assumed was free has filed a federal class-action lawsuit against the hotel chain, saying he was deceived by a scheme that also hurts the environment.&#8221; [San Francisco Chronicle] More: Jeff Bercovici, Forbes. Tweet [...]</p><p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/08/class-action-i-thought-usa-today-at-my-hotel-was-free/">Class action: I thought USA Today at my hotel was free</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A guest at a Hilton hotel in Santa Rosa who was upset that he was billed 75 cents for a newspaper he assumed was free has filed a federal class-action lawsuit against the hotel chain, saying he was deceived by a scheme that also hurts the environment.&#8221; [<a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/07/30/BA731KGP7F.DTL">San Francisco Chronicle</a>] <strong>More</strong>: <a href="http://blogs.forbes.com/jeffbercovici/2011/08/02/how-usa-today-slips-82-million-a-year-onto-your-hotel-bill/">Jeff Bercovici, Forbes</a>.</p>
<div class="sharing"><div class="sharing-button"><div class="fb-like" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/08/class-action-i-thought-usa-today-at-my-hotel-was-free/" data-send="true" data-layout="button_count" data-show-faces="false"></div></div>
<div class="sharing-button"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="horizontal" data-via="overlawyered" data-related="walterolson" data-text="Class action: I thought USA Today at my hotel was free" data-url="http://overlawyered.com/2011/08/class-action-i-thought-usa-today-at-my-hotel-was-free/">Tweet</a></div>
<div class="sharing-button gplus"><div class="g-plus" data-action="share" data-annotation="bubble" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/08/class-action-i-thought-usa-today-at-my-hotel-was-free/"></div></div></div>
	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/class-actions/" title="class actions" rel="tag">class actions</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/hotels/" title="hotels" rel="tag">hotels</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/newspapers/" title="newspapers" rel="tag">newspapers</a><br />
<p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/08/class-action-i-thought-usa-today-at-my-hotel-was-free/">Class action: I thought USA Today at my hotel was free</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2011/08/class-action-i-thought-usa-today-at-my-hotel-was-free/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>June 22 roundup</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2011/06/june-22-roundup/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=june-22-roundup</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2011/06/june-22-roundup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 05:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[animals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Lerach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chasing clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crime and punishment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gambling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hotels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Frank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=23497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Supreme Court disbars Bill Lerach [Richard Samp, WLF] And check out the byline of the former class-action king&#8217;s recent contribution to The Nation; do you think it omits anything material? [h/t Bob Lenzner] Ted Frank guessed right on outcome of Wal-Mart case but still lost big betting on it [PoL] After feds seize online bettors&#8217; [...]</p><p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/06/june-22-roundup/">June 22 roundup</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>Supreme Court disbars Bill Lerach [<a href="http://wlflegalpulse.com/2011/06/14/tea-leaf-reading-at-the-high-court-plus-a-final-good-riddance-to-bill-lerach/">Richard Samp, WLF</a>] And check out <a href="http://www.thenation.com/authors/william-lerach">the byline</a> of the former class-action king&#8217;s recent <a href="http://www.thenation.com/article/161259/guarantee-corporate-responsibility-open-boardroom-door">contribution to The Nation</a>; do you think it omits <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2008/02/11/breaking-news-bill-lerach-gets-two-years-in-prison/">anything material</a>? [h/t <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/boblenzner/status/82991003346276352">Bob Lenzner</a>] </li>
<li>Ted Frank guessed right on outcome of Wal-Mart case but still lost big betting on it [<a href="http://www.pointoflaw.com/archives/2011/06/wal-mart-bet-po.php">PoL</a>]  </li>
<li>After feds seize online bettors&#8217; money, Anne Arundel County, Maryland police department crows over windfall [<a href="http://www.openmarket.org/2011/06/13/police-celebrate-seized-online-gambling-funds/">CEI</a>] And c&#8217;mon Maryland, surely we in the home state of H.L. Mencken and Frederick Douglass can do better in the liberty rankings than <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/jun/20/maryland-earns-last-place-in-personal-freedom-rati/">this</a>; </li>
<li>&#8220;Wrongful-Death Lawsuit Filed After Man Killed by Rooster&#8221; [<a href="http://www.loweringthebar.net/2011/06/wrongful-death-lawsuit-filed-after-man-killed-by-rooster.html">Lowering the Bar</a>]  </li>
<li>Hotel union behind California bill mandating fitted sheets [<a href="http://dailycaller.com/2011/06/15/hotel-union-tucks-support-behind-california-legislation-mandating-fitted-bed-sheets/">Daily Caller</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/05/california-bill-would-mandate-fitted-rather-than-flat-sheets-on-hotel-beds/">earlier</a>]  </li>
<li>Fifth Circuit upholds constitutionality of Texas law banning barratry (stirring up litigation) [<a href="http://curmudgeonlycounselor.blogspot.com/2011/06/federal-court-of-appeals-upholds.html">Christian Southwick</a>, <a href="http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2011/06/fifth-circuit-reverses-usdc-that-had-held-texas-barratry-unconsitutional-on-first-amendment-grounds.html">Legal Ethics Forum</a>]  </li>
<li>A Linda Greenhouse column I agree with? One of us must be slipping [<a href="http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/06/15/activists-by-invitation/?nl=opinion&#038;emc=tya1">vagueness in criminal statutes</a>, see related <a href="http://reason.com/archives/2011/06/21/what-you-dont-know-can-hurt-yo">Harvey Silverglate</a>] </li>
</ul>
<div class="sharing"><div class="sharing-button"><div class="fb-like" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/06/june-22-roundup/" data-send="true" data-layout="button_count" data-show-faces="false"></div></div>
<div class="sharing-button"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="horizontal" data-via="overlawyered" data-related="walterolson" data-text="June 22 roundup" data-url="http://overlawyered.com/2011/06/june-22-roundup/">Tweet</a></div>
<div class="sharing-button gplus"><div class="g-plus" data-action="share" data-annotation="bubble" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/06/june-22-roundup/"></div></div></div>
	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/animals/" title="animals" rel="tag">animals</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/bill-lerach/" title="Bill Lerach" rel="tag">Bill Lerach</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/chasing-clients/" title="chasing clients" rel="tag">chasing clients</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/crime-and-punishment/" title="crime and punishment" rel="tag">crime and punishment</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/gambling/" title="gambling" rel="tag">gambling</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/hotels/" title="hotels" rel="tag">hotels</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/maryland/" title="Maryland" rel="tag">Maryland</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/new-york-times/" title="New York Times" rel="tag">New York Times</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/ted-frank/" title="Ted Frank" rel="tag">Ted Frank</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/texas/" title="Texas" rel="tag">Texas</a><br />
<p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/06/june-22-roundup/">June 22 roundup</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2011/06/june-22-roundup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2011/05/california-bill-would-mandate-fitted-rather-than-flat-sheets-on-hotel-beds/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=california-bill-would-mandate-fitted-rather-than-flat-sheets-on-hotel-beds</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2011/05/california-bill-would-mandate-fitted-rather-than-flat-sheets-on-hotel-beds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 16:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hotels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workplace]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=22826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Because, really, there&#8217;s no detail too small for the government to regulate (via Virginia Postrel). More: Coyote. Tweet Tags: California, hotels, workplace</p><p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/05/california-bill-would-mandate-fitted-rather-than-flat-sheets-on-hotel-beds/">California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because, really, there&#8217;s <a href="http://1.usa.gov/hxCMUE">no detail too small for the government to regulate</a> (via Virginia Postrel). <strong>More</strong>: <a href="http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2011/05/where-does-it-end.html">Coyote</a>.</p>
<div class="sharing"><div class="sharing-button"><div class="fb-like" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/05/california-bill-would-mandate-fitted-rather-than-flat-sheets-on-hotel-beds/" data-send="true" data-layout="button_count" data-show-faces="false"></div></div>
<div class="sharing-button"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="horizontal" data-via="overlawyered" data-related="walterolson" data-text="California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds" data-url="http://overlawyered.com/2011/05/california-bill-would-mandate-fitted-rather-than-flat-sheets-on-hotel-beds/">Tweet</a></div>
<div class="sharing-button gplus"><div class="g-plus" data-action="share" data-annotation="bubble" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/05/california-bill-would-mandate-fitted-rather-than-flat-sheets-on-hotel-beds/"></div></div></div>
	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/california/" title="California" rel="tag">California</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/hotels/" title="hotels" rel="tag">hotels</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/workplace/" title="workplace" rel="tag">workplace</a><br />
<p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2011/05/california-bill-would-mandate-fitted-rather-than-flat-sheets-on-hotel-beds/">California bill would mandate fitted, rather than flat, sheets on hotel beds</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2011/05/california-bill-would-mandate-fitted-rather-than-flat-sheets-on-hotel-beds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Mount Washington Hotel to businesses: Stop using mountain&#8217;s name&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2010/11/mount-washington-hotel-to-businesses-stop-using-mountains-name/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=mount-washington-hotel-to-businesses-stop-using-mountains-name</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2010/11/mount-washington-hotel-to-businesses-stop-using-mountains-name/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 05:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hotels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=20132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A state lawmaker tells WMWV-FM that the Mount Washington Hotel and Resort has told other businesses with &#8216;Mount Washington&#8217; in their name to stop using it or face a legal challenge.&#8221; The hotel says it has challenged only three lodging businesses and does not intend to go after other local businesses named after the mountain. [...]</p><p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/11/mount-washington-hotel-to-businesses-stop-using-mountains-name/">&#8220;Mount Washington Hotel to businesses: Stop using mountain&#8217;s name&#8221;</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A state lawmaker tells WMWV-FM that the Mount Washington Hotel and Resort has told other businesses with &#8216;Mount Washington&#8217; in their name to stop using it or face a legal challenge.&#8221; The hotel says it has challenged only three lodging businesses and does not intend to go after other local businesses named after the mountain. [<a href="http://www.seacoastonline.com/articles/20101111-NEWS-101119947">AP</a>, <a href="http://www.wmur.com/r/25776429/detail.html">WMUR</a>, <a href="http://www.boston.com/travel/blog/2010/11/trademark_war_b.html">Boston Globe</a>]</p>
<p><strong>P.S.</strong> Commenter Mannie: &#8220;It gets better.  The IOC routinely harasses businesses on Washington&#8217;s Olympic Peninsula for using the name &#8216;Olympic.&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<div class="sharing"><div class="sharing-button"><div class="fb-like" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/11/mount-washington-hotel-to-businesses-stop-using-mountains-name/" data-send="true" data-layout="button_count" data-show-faces="false"></div></div>
<div class="sharing-button"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="horizontal" data-via="overlawyered" data-related="walterolson" data-text="&#8220;Mount Washington Hotel to businesses: Stop using mountain&#8217;s name&#8221;" data-url="http://overlawyered.com/2010/11/mount-washington-hotel-to-businesses-stop-using-mountains-name/">Tweet</a></div>
<div class="sharing-button gplus"><div class="g-plus" data-action="share" data-annotation="bubble" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/11/mount-washington-hotel-to-businesses-stop-using-mountains-name/"></div></div></div>
	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/hotels/" title="hotels" rel="tag">hotels</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/new-hampshire/" title="New Hampshire" rel="tag">New Hampshire</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/trademarks/" title="trademarks" rel="tag">trademarks</a><br />
<p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/11/mount-washington-hotel-to-businesses-stop-using-mountains-name/">&#8220;Mount Washington Hotel to businesses: Stop using mountain&#8217;s name&#8221;</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2010/11/mount-washington-hotel-to-businesses-stop-using-mountains-name/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update: New York bill banning short-term rentals</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2010/07/update-new-york-bill-banning-short-term-rentals/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=update-new-york-bill-banning-short-term-rentals</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2010/07/update-new-york-bill-banning-short-term-rentals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 05:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hotels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=18349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Advocates have been hawking the ban in the state legislature as a tenant protection measure. To their dismay, however, Gov. Paterson has signaled that he intends to veto the bill. [NYT, earlier] The Times travel section had a story over the weekend praising the new kind of &#8220;Social B&#038;B&#8221; arrangement as a welcome travel bargain, [...]</p><p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/07/update-new-york-bill-banning-short-term-rentals/">Update: New York bill banning short-term rentals</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Advocates have been hawking the ban in the state legislature as a tenant protection measure. To their dismay, however, Gov. Paterson has signaled that he intends to veto the bill. [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/19/nyregion/19hotel.html?_r=1&#038;emc=tnt&#038;tntemail1=y">NYT</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/07/new-york-may-ban-informal-short-term-rentals/">earlier</a>] The Times travel section had a story over the weekend praising the new kind of &#8220;Social B&#038;B&#8221; arrangement as a welcome travel bargain, but the newspaper does not seem to have realized that there is any connection between its two articles.</p>
<div class="sharing"><div class="sharing-button"><div class="fb-like" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/07/update-new-york-bill-banning-short-term-rentals/" data-send="true" data-layout="button_count" data-show-faces="false"></div></div>
<div class="sharing-button"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="horizontal" data-via="overlawyered" data-related="walterolson" data-text="Update: New York bill banning short-term rentals" data-url="http://overlawyered.com/2010/07/update-new-york-bill-banning-short-term-rentals/">Tweet</a></div>
<div class="sharing-button gplus"><div class="g-plus" data-action="share" data-annotation="bubble" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/07/update-new-york-bill-banning-short-term-rentals/"></div></div></div>
	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/hotels/" title="hotels" rel="tag">hotels</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/new-york/" title="New York" rel="tag">New York</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/new-york-times/" title="New York Times" rel="tag">New York Times</a><br />
<p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/07/update-new-york-bill-banning-short-term-rentals/">Update: New York bill banning short-term rentals</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2010/07/update-new-york-bill-banning-short-term-rentals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York may ban informal short-term rentals</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2010/07/new-york-may-ban-informal-short-term-rentals/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=new-york-may-ban-informal-short-term-rentals</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2010/07/new-york-may-ban-informal-short-term-rentals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 05:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hotels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=18041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Is it too cynical to detect a whiff of hotel-protection in this crackdown? [Sean O'Neill, Newsweek Budget Travel] Tweet Tags: hotels, New York</p><p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/07/new-york-may-ban-informal-short-term-rentals/">New York may ban informal short-term rentals</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it too cynical to detect a whiff of hotel-protection in this crackdown? [<a href="http://current.newsweek.com/budgettravel/2010/06/new_york_controversy_a_crackdo.html">Sean O'Neill, Newsweek Budget Travel</a>] </p>
<div class="sharing"><div class="sharing-button"><div class="fb-like" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/07/new-york-may-ban-informal-short-term-rentals/" data-send="true" data-layout="button_count" data-show-faces="false"></div></div>
<div class="sharing-button"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="horizontal" data-via="overlawyered" data-related="walterolson" data-text="New York may ban informal short-term rentals" data-url="http://overlawyered.com/2010/07/new-york-may-ban-informal-short-term-rentals/">Tweet</a></div>
<div class="sharing-button gplus"><div class="g-plus" data-action="share" data-annotation="bubble" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/07/new-york-may-ban-informal-short-term-rentals/"></div></div></div>
	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/hotels/" title="hotels" rel="tag">hotels</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/new-york/" title="New York" rel="tag">New York</a><br />
<p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/07/new-york-may-ban-informal-short-term-rentals/">New York may ban informal short-term rentals</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2010/07/new-york-may-ban-informal-short-term-rentals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;David Carradine&#8217;s Widow Files Wrongful Death Suit&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2010/06/david-carradines-widow-files-wrongful-death-suit/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=david-carradines-widow-files-wrongful-death-suit</link>
		<comments>http://overlawyered.com/2010/06/david-carradines-widow-files-wrongful-death-suit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 11:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[celebrities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hotels]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=17706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A year after &#8216;Kung Fu&#8217; actor David Carradine died from a dangerous sex practice, his wife has filed suit, claiming he would still be alive if he hadn&#8217;t been left alone in a hotel that night.&#8221; California attorney and Overlawyered favorite Mark Geragos is representing Anne Carradine. [ABC News] Tweet Tags: celebrities, hotels</p><p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/06/david-carradines-widow-files-wrongful-death-suit/">&#8220;David Carradine&#8217;s Widow Files Wrongful Death Suit&#8221;</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A year after &#8216;Kung Fu&#8217; actor David Carradine died from a dangerous sex practice, his wife has filed suit, claiming he would still be alive if he hadn&#8217;t been left alone in a hotel that night.&#8221; California attorney and Overlawyered favorite Mark Geragos is representing Anne Carradine. [<a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/david-carradines-widow-files-wrongful-death-suit/story?id=10825994">ABC News</a>]</p>
<div class="sharing"><div class="sharing-button"><div class="fb-like" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/06/david-carradines-widow-files-wrongful-death-suit/" data-send="true" data-layout="button_count" data-show-faces="false"></div></div>
<div class="sharing-button"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="horizontal" data-via="overlawyered" data-related="walterolson" data-text="&#8220;David Carradine&#8217;s Widow Files Wrongful Death Suit&#8221;" data-url="http://overlawyered.com/2010/06/david-carradines-widow-files-wrongful-death-suit/">Tweet</a></div>
<div class="sharing-button gplus"><div class="g-plus" data-action="share" data-annotation="bubble" data-href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/06/david-carradines-widow-files-wrongful-death-suit/"></div></div></div>
	Tags: <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/celebrities/" title="celebrities" rel="tag">celebrities</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/hotels/" title="hotels" rel="tag">hotels</a><br />
<p><a href="http://overlawyered.com/2010/06/david-carradines-widow-files-wrongful-death-suit/">&#8220;David Carradine&#8217;s Widow Files Wrongful Death Suit&#8221;</a> is a post from <a href="http://overlawyered.com">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://overlawyered.com/2010/06/david-carradines-widow-files-wrongful-death-suit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.362 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-05-27 20:00:02 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
